These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24003160)

  • 1. Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program.
    Zheng H; Robinson BE; Liang YC; Polasky S; Ma DC; Wang FC; Ruckelshaus M; Ouyang ZY; Daily GC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Oct; 110(41):16681-6. PubMed ID: 24003160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrating ecosystem services trade-offs with paddy land-to-dry land decisions: A scenario approach in Erhai Lake Basin, southwest China.
    Hu Y; Peng J; Liu Y; Tian L
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 625():849-860. PubMed ID: 29306828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales.
    Li C; Zheng H; Li S; Chen X; Li J; Zeng W; Liang Y; Polasky S; Feldman MW; Ruckelshaus M; Ouyang Z; Daily GC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7396-401. PubMed ID: 26082546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services.
    Chen X; Lupi F; Viña A; He G; Liu J
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1469-78. PubMed ID: 20586786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrated assessments of payments for ecosystem services programs.
    Liu J; Yang W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Oct; 110(41):16297-8. PubMed ID: 24072648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gains or losses? A quantitative estimation of environmental and economic effects of an ecological compensation policy.
    Zhang Q; Hong J; Wu F; Yang Y; Dong C
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Jul; 31(5):e02341. PubMed ID: 33817892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investing in sustainable catchments.
    Everard M
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 May; 324(1-3):1-24. PubMed ID: 15081693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rural Household Preferences for Active Participation in "Payment for Ecosystem Service" Programs: A Case in the Miyun Reservoir Catchment, China.
    Li H; Bennett MT; Jiang X; Zhang K; Yang X
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169483. PubMed ID: 28046106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regional differences and the driving mechanism of relationships between rural household livelihood and ecosystem services:A case study in upstream watershed of Miyun Reservoir, China.
    Wang FC; Zheng H; Zhang W; Wang H; Peng WJ
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2021 Nov; 32(11):3872-3882. PubMed ID: 34898103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Land use trade-offs in China's protected areas from the perspective of accounting values of ecosystem services.
    Chen H; Costanza R; Kubiszewski I
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 315():115178. PubMed ID: 35504187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A revealed preference approach to estimating supply curves for ecosystem services: use of auctions to set payments for soil erosion control in Indonesia.
    Jack BK; Leimona B; Ferraro PJ
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 18983597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computing payment for ecosystem services in watersheds: an analysis of the Middle Route Project of South-to-North Water Diversion in China.
    Dong Z; Yan Y; Duan J; Fu X; Zhou Q; Huang X; Zhu X; Zhao J
    J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(12):2005-12. PubMed ID: 22432331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact on rural livelihoods and ecosystem services of a major relocation and settlement program: A case in Shaanxi, China.
    Li C; Li S; Feldman MW; Li J; Zheng H; Daily GC
    Ambio; 2018 Mar; 47(2):245-259. PubMed ID: 28983793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Dynamic changes of ecosystem service value in Pinggu District of Beijing].
    Li B; Song XY; Xie HL; Hao LX; Zhang SH
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2008 Oct; 19(10):2251-8. PubMed ID: 19123363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing ecological infrastructure investments.
    Adamowicz W; Calderon-Etter L; Entem A; Fenichel EP; Hall JS; Lloyd-Smith P; Ogden FL; Regina JA; Rouhi Rad M; Stallard RF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Mar; 116(12):5254-5261. PubMed ID: 30617080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of payments for ecosystem services programs in China on rural household labor allocation and land use: Identifying complex pathways.
    Wang Y; Zhang Q; Bilsborrow R; Tao S; Chen X; Sullivan-Wiley K; Huang Q; Li J; Song C
    Land use policy; 2020 Dec; 99():. PubMed ID: 33223592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Livelihood changes matter for the sustainability of ecological restoration: A case analysis of the Grain for Green Program in China's largest Giant Panda Reserve.
    Xu J; Wang Q; Kong M
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Apr; 8(8):3842-3850. PubMed ID: 29721261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the influences of ecological restoration on perceptions of cultural ecosystem services by residents of agricultural landscapes of western China.
    Dou Y; Zhen L; Yu X; Bakker M; Carsjens GJ; Xue Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 646():685-695. PubMed ID: 30059928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regional social-ecological system coupling process from a water flow perspective.
    Wang Y; Li J; Wang Y; Bai J
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Dec; 853():158646. PubMed ID: 36089019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Households' preferences for hydrological services in Veracruz, Mexico: The importance of outcomes vs. program design.
    McGinnis I; Atallah SS; Huang JC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 300():113763. PubMed ID: 34649329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.