These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24004801)

  • 1. Assessing communication accessibility in the university classroom: towards a goal of universal hearing accessibility.
    Cheesman MF; Jennings MB; Klinger L
    Work; 2013; 46(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 24004801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using personal response systems to assess speech perception within the classroom: an approach to determine the efficacy of sound field amplification in primary school classrooms.
    Vickers DA; Backus BC; Macdonald NK; Rostamzadeh NK; Mason NK; Pandya R; Marriage JE; Mahon MH
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):491-502. PubMed ID: 23340455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developmental effects and spatial hearing in young children with normal-hearing sensitivity.
    Schafer EC; Beeler S; Ramos H; Morais M; Monzingo J; Algier K
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):e32-43. PubMed ID: 22688920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustics in educational settings. Subcommittee on Acoustics in Educational Settings of the Bioacoustics Standards and Noise Standards Committee American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
    ASHA Suppl; 1995 Mar; 37(3 Suppl 14):15-9. PubMed ID: 7696882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rating, ranking, and understanding acoustical quality in university classrooms.
    Hodgson M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):568-75. PubMed ID: 12186038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noise and communication: a three-year update.
    Brammer AJ; Laroche C
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(61):281-6. PubMed ID: 23257578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of room acoustics and sound-field amplification on word recognition performance in young adult listeners in suboptimal listening conditions.
    Larsen JB; Vega A; Ribera JE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 17(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 18519579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of sound-field amplification devices in different types of classrooms.
    Wilson WJ; Marinac J; Pitty K; Burrows C
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2011 Oct; 42(4):395-407. PubMed ID: 21616989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic environments that support equally accessible oral higher education as a human right.
    Van Den Heuij KML; Neijenhuis K; Coene M
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Feb; 20(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 29271668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive abilities relate to self-reported hearing disability.
    Zekveld AA; George EL; Houtgast T; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1364-72. PubMed ID: 23838985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring speech recognition in children with cochlear implants in a virtual classroom.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):532-40. PubMed ID: 22215040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception by students with cochlear implants using sound-field systems in classrooms.
    Iglehart F
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 15248805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The deaf and the classroom design: a contribution of the built environmental ergonomics for the accessibility.
    Martins LB; Gaudiot DM
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3663-8. PubMed ID: 22317280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting speech interference in classrooms.
    Picard M; Bradley JS
    Audiology; 2001; 40(5):221-44. PubMed ID: 11688542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.