These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24004961)

  • 1. Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial.
    Fron Chabouis H; Prot C; Fonteneau C; Nasr K; Chabreron O; Cazier S; Moussally C; Gaucher A; Khabthani Ben Jaballah I; Boyer R; Leforestier JF; Caumont-Prim A; Chemla F; Maman L; Nabet C; Attal JP
    Trials; 2013 Sep; 14():278. PubMed ID: 24004961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ceramic inlays: a case presentation and lessons learned from the literature.
    Boushell LW; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19368595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review.
    Fron Chabouis H; Smail Faugeron V; Attal JP
    Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1209-18. PubMed ID: 24119328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study.
    Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 May; 30(3):229-239. PubMed ID: 29368375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical efficacy of ceramic versus resin-based composite endocrowns in Chinese adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J; Ling Z; Zheng Z; Zheng C; Gai Y; Zeng Y; Zhu X; Chen L; Wu B; Yan W
    Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):559. PubMed ID: 32571397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis.
    Yamanel K; Caglar A; Gülsahi K; Ozden UA
    Dent Mater J; 2009 Nov; 28(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 20019416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival Rate of Resin and Ceramic Inlays, Onlays, and Overlays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Morimoto S; Rebello de Sampaio FB; Braga MM; Sesma N; Özcan M
    J Dent Res; 2016 Aug; 95(9):985-94. PubMed ID: 27287305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.
    Vianna ALSV; Prado CJD; Bicalho AA; Pereira RADS; Neves FDD; Soares CJ
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations.
    Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 25448436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study.
    Saridag S; Sevimay M; Pekkan G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):626-34. PubMed ID: 23391033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Submargination of a resin luting cement--a clinical case report.
    Chan DC; Titus HW
    Tex Dent J; 1996 Dec; 113(12):22-5. PubMed ID: 9518821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro two-body wear of inlay-onlay composite resin restoratives.
    Burgoyne AR; Nicholls JI; Brudvik JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 2051355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays.
    O'Neal SJ; Miracle RL; Leinfelder KF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1993 Dec; 124(12):48-54. PubMed ID: 8277057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A practice-based research network on the survival of ceramic inlay/onlay restorations.
    Collares K; Corrêa MB; Laske M; Kramer E; Reiss B; Moraes RR; Huysmans MC; Opdam NJ
    Dent Mater; 2016 May; 32(5):687-94. PubMed ID: 26975695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.