These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24005790)

  • 1. Pilgrims sailing the Titanic: plausibility effects on memory for misinformation.
    Hinze SR; Slaten DG; Horton WS; Jenkins R; Rapp DN
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):305-24. PubMed ID: 24005790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing reliance on inaccurate information.
    Rapp DN; Hinze SR; Kohlhepp K; Ryskin RA
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 23761183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluative mindsets can protect against the influence of false information.
    Salovich NA; Kirsch AM; Rapp DN
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105121. PubMed ID: 35429735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Credible narrators and misinformed readers.
    Houghton KJ; Poirier RC; Klin CM
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):825-844. PubMed ID: 36450939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is it smart to read on your phone? The impact of reading format and culture on the continued influence of misinformation.
    Xu Y; Wong R; He S; Veldre A; Andrews S
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1112-1127. PubMed ID: 32430888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The selective power of causality on memory errors.
    Marsh JK; Kulkofsky S
    Memory; 2015; 23(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 24528112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reminders of Everyday Misinformation Statements Can Enhance Memory for and Beliefs in Corrections of Those Statements in the Short Term.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Peske CD
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 32976064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports.
    Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26147670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Look it up: Online search reduces the problematic effects of exposures to inaccuracies.
    Donovan AM; Rapp DN
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1128-1145. PubMed ID: 32441010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readers' reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension.
    Sparks JR; Rapp DN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):230-47. PubMed ID: 21244116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What if? Neural activity underlying semantic and episodic counterfactual thinking.
    Parikh N; Ruzic L; Stewart GW; Spreng RN; De Brigard F
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():332-345. PubMed ID: 29807153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When Misinformation Improves Memory.
    Putnam AL; Sungkhasettee VW; Roediger HL
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Jan; 28(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 27879321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of postwarning specificity on memory performance and confidence in the eyewitness misinformation paradigm.
    Higham PA; Blank H; Luna K
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):417-432. PubMed ID: 28816470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Would a madman have been so wise as this?" The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation.
    Foy JE; LoCasto PC; Briner SW; Dyar S
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Feb; 45(2):281-295. PubMed ID: 27726095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of misinformation manipulations on evaluative conditioning.
    Benedict T; Richter J; Gast A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Mar; 194():28-36. PubMed ID: 30731394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese.
    Yang J; Li N; Wang S; Slattery TJ; Rayner K
    Vis cogn; 2014 Jan; 22(2):193-213. PubMed ID: 24910514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Misinformed and unaware? Metacognition and the influence of inaccurate information.
    Salovich NA; Rapp DN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(4):608-624. PubMed ID: 33151721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can readers ignore implausibility? Evidence for nonstrategic monitoring of event-based plausibility in language comprehension.
    Isberner MB; Richter T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Jan; 142(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 23165201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thinking aloud: effects on text comprehension by children with specific language impairment and their peers.
    McClintock B; Pesco D; Martin-Chang S
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2014 Nov; 49(6):637-48. PubMed ID: 25180778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferential revision in narrative texts: An ERP study.
    Pérez A; Cain K; Castellanos MC; Bajo T
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1105-35. PubMed ID: 26047776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.