These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2400620)
1. Vaginal birth after cesarean: issues and implications. Resick LK; Erlen JA J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 1990; 2(3):100-6. PubMed ID: 2400620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Malpractice and obstetric practice: the correlation of malpractice premiums to rates of vaginal and cesarean delivery. Johnson CT; Choubey V; Satin AJ; Werner EF Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):545-546. PubMed ID: 26767796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates. Dubay L; Kaestner R; Waidmann T J Health Econ; 1999 Aug; 18(4):491-522. PubMed ID: 10539619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Bergholt T; Østberg B; Legarth J; Weber T Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Mar; 83(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 14995922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The labor-adjusted cesarean section: a more informative method than the cesarean section "rate" for assessing a practitioner's labor and delivery skills. Sandmire HF Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 178(1 Pt 1):196-7. PubMed ID: 9465833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cesarean delivery rates and obstetric culture - an Italian register-based study. Plevani C; Incerti M; Del Sorbo D; Pintucci A; Vergani P; Merlino L; Locatelli A Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Mar; 96(3):359-365. PubMed ID: 27869984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a protocol for selecting fetuses in breech presentation for vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Albrechtsen S; Rasmussen S; Reigstad H; Markestad T; Irgens LM; Dalaker K Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):586-92. PubMed ID: 9322628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The institutional factor in cesarean section rates. Lowe NK J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2002; 31(3):245. PubMed ID: 12033535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Doing something" about the cesarean delivery rate. Clark SL; Garite TJ; Hamilton EF; Belfort MA; Hankins GD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 219(3):267-271. PubMed ID: 29733840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Green Bay cesarean section study. IV. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates for the large fetus. Sandmire HF; DeMott RK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 174(5):1557-64. PubMed ID: 9065129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Green Bay cesarean section study. III. Falling cesarean birth rates without a formal curtailment program. Sandmire HF; DeMott RK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1790-9; discussion 1799-802. PubMed ID: 8203440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The labor-adjusted cesarean section rate--a more informative method than the cesarean section "rate" for assessing a practitioner's labor and delivery skills. Elliott JP; Russell MM; Dickason LA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 177(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 9240597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. Macfarlane AJ; Blondel B; Mohangoo AD; Cuttini M; Nijhuis J; Novak Z; Ólafsdóttir HS; Zeitlin J; BJOG; 2016 Mar; 123(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 25753683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Multi-centric clinical study of trial of labor after cesarean section]. Yu L; Su CH; Wang XY; Gong JJ; Chen P; Du HM; Quan QH; Li LL; Chen DJ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):581-5. PubMed ID: 27561936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of a nurses' strike on the cesarean birth rate. Mustard CA; Harman CR; Hall PF; Derksen S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Feb; 172(2 Pt 1):631-7. PubMed ID: 7856697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynaecologists in Turkey. Küçük M J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Feb; 38(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 28891358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]