These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24006341)
1. Uncertainty in MR tracer kinetic parameters and water exchange rates estimated from T1-weighted dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Zhang J; Kim S Magn Reson Med; 2014 Aug; 72(2):534-45. PubMed ID: 24006341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved accuracy and precision of tracer kinetic parameters by joint fitting to variable flip angle and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. Dickie BR; Banerji A; Kershaw LE; McPartlin A; Choudhury A; West CM; Rose CJ Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1270-81. PubMed ID: 26480291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration? Wake N; Chandarana H; Rusinek H; Fujimoto K; Moy L; Sodickson DK; Kim SG Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():16-23. PubMed ID: 29777820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of cellular-interstitial water exchange in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using two flip angles. Zhang J; Kim SG NMR Biomed; 2019 Nov; 32(11):e4135. PubMed ID: 31348580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cellular-interstitial water exchange and its effect on the determination of contrast agent concentration in vivo: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of human internal obturator muscle. Buckley DL; Kershaw LE; Stanisz GJ Magn Reson Med; 2008 Nov; 60(5):1011-9. PubMed ID: 18956419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Study of inter-software accuracy and reproducibility using simulated and clinical data. Beuzit L; Eliat PA; Brun V; Ferré JC; Gandon Y; Bannier E; Saint-Jalmes H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1288-300. PubMed ID: 26687041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous measurement of T Zhang J; Winters K; Reynaud O; Kim SG NMR Biomed; 2017 Sep; 30(9):. PubMed ID: 28544159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cluster analysis of DCE-MRI data identifies regional tracer-kinetic changes after tumor treatment with high intensity focused ultrasound. Jacobs I; Hectors SJ; Schabel MC; Grüll H; Strijkers GJ; Nicolay K NMR Biomed; 2015 Nov; 28(11):1443-54. PubMed ID: 26390040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of saturation-recovery dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition protocol: monte carlo simulation approach demonstrated with gadolinium MR renography. Zhang JL; Conlin CC; Carlston K; Xie L; Kim D; Morrell G; Morton K; Lee VS NMR Biomed; 2016 Jul; 29(7):969-77. PubMed ID: 27200499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in mice: an investigation of model parameter uncertainties. Rukat T; Walker-Samuel S; Reinsberg SA Magn Reson Med; 2015 May; 73(5):1979-87. PubMed ID: 25052296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the performance of tracer kinetic model-driven registration for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using different models of contrast enhancement. Buonaccorsi GA; Roberts C; Cheung S; Watson Y; O'Connor JP; Davies K; Jackson A; Jayson GC; Parker GJ Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1112-23. PubMed ID: 16935723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix. Donaldson SB; West CM; Davidson SE; Carrington BM; Hutchison G; Jones AP; Sourbron SP; Buckley DL Magn Reson Med; 2010 Mar; 63(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 20187179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameter ratios in DCE-MRI using the reference region model. Lee J; Platt S; Kent M; Zhao Q Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 30(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 22071409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High temporal resolution 3D gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging of renal tumors with pharmacokinetic modeling: preliminary observations. Chandarana H; Amarosa A; Huang WC; Kang SK; Taneja S; Melamed J; Kim S J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):802-8. PubMed ID: 23389833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI. Singh A; Rathore RK; Haris M; Verma SK; Husain N; Gupta RK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 19097111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameter estimation on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate: Preliminary evaluation of a novel AIF-free estimation method. Ginsburg SB; Taimen P; Merisaari H; Vainio P; Boström PJ; Aronen HJ; Jambor I; Madabhushi A J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 27285161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimized Fast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: Effect of Sampling Duration on Pharmacokinetic Parameters. Othman AE; Falkner F; Martirosian P; Schraml C; Schwentner C; Nickel D; Nikolaou K; Notohamiprodjo M Invest Radiol; 2016 Feb; 51(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 26447494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters. Ocak I; Bernardo M; Metzger G; Barrett T; Pinto P; Albert PS; Choyke PL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):849. PubMed ID: 17885055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of liver fibrosis using pharmacokinetic parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Li Z; Sun J; Chen L; Huang N; Hu P; Hu X; Han G; Zhou Y; Bai W; Niu T; Yang X J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 26707910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]