These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24006878)

  • 1. Perturbations in action goal influence bimanual grasp posture planning.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 24006878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corrections in grasp posture in response to modifications of action goals.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Spiegel MA; Oehmichen C; Hammes J; Schack T
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43015. PubMed ID: 22970119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Knoblauch A; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):529-38. PubMed ID: 25370347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of multiple planning constraints on the development of grasp posture planning in 6- to 10-year-old children.
    Stöckel T; Hughes CM
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Sep; 51(9):1254-61. PubMed ID: 26192045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problems in planning bimanually incongruent grasp postures relate to simultaneous response specification processes.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Reissig P
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Jun; 87():22-9. PubMed ID: 24650762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.
    Hughes CM; Haddad JM; Franz EA; Zelaznik HN; Ryu JH
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 21484393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of initial and final precision on motor planning: individual differences in end-state comfort during unimanual grasping and placing.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Schack T
    J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 22551086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. End-state comfort trumps handedness in object manipulation.
    Coelho CJ; Studenka BE; Rosenbaum DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):718-30. PubMed ID: 24294873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choosing between alternative wrist postures: action planning needs perception.
    Dijkerman HC; McIntosh RD; Schindler I; Nijboer TC; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1476-82. PubMed ID: 19114051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limits of end-state planning.
    Hermens F; Kral D; Rosenbaum DA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():148-62. PubMed ID: 24531145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of irrelevant stimulus orientation on visually guided grasping movements.
    Wühr P; Elsner B
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 121(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17469919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of action possibility and end-state comfort on motor imagery of manual action sequences.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Dec; 101():12-6. PubMed ID: 26544603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing planning of a familiar grasp to an object: what it is to pick a cup.
    Rounis E; Zhang Z; Pizzamiglio G; Duta M; Humphreys G
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1281-1296. PubMed ID: 28204861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor planning is facilitated by adopting an action's goal posture: an fMRI study.
    Zimmermann M; Meulenbroek RG; de Lange FP
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Jan; 22(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 21613471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity to biomechanical limitations during postural decision-making depends on the integrity of posterior superior parietal cortex.
    Wood DK; Chouinard PA; Major AJ; Goodale MA
    Cortex; 2017 Dec; 97():202-220. PubMed ID: 27477623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tactile interference in visually guided reach-to-grasp movements.
    Kritikos A; Beresford M
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11976754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Reissig P; Schütz C
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jun; 219(3):391-401. PubMed ID: 22562588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planning for manual positioning: the end-state comfort effect for manual abduction-adduction.
    Zhang W; Rosenbaum DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 17763845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postural invariance in three-dimensional reaching and grasping movements.
    Gréa H; Desmurget M; Prablanc C
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Sep; 134(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 11037282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.