These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24007317)

  • 1. Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry.
    Adam Noah J; Spierer DK; Gu J; Bronner S
    J Med Eng Technol; 2013 Oct; 37(7):456-62. PubMed ID: 24007317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a wearable body monitoring device during treadmill walking and jogging in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.
    Munguía-Izquierdo D; Santalla A; Legaz-Arrese A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jan; 93(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 22200390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
    Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running.
    Price K; Bird SR; Lythgo N; Raj IS; Wong JY; Lynch C
    J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 27919170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure.
    Sushames A; Edwards A; Thompson F; McDermott R; Gebel K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of the Actical activity monitor for assessing steps and energy expenditure during walking.
    Johnson M; Meltz K; Hart K; Schmudlach M; Clarkson L; Borman K
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(8):769-76. PubMed ID: 25356920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Field evaluation of energy expenditure in women using Tritrac accelerometers.
    Campbell KL; Crocker PR; McKenzie DC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Oct; 34(10):1667-74. PubMed ID: 12370570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.
    Evenson KR; Goto MM; Furberg RD
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():159. PubMed ID: 26684758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of the TriTrac-R3D accelerometer to estimate energy expenditure.
    Jakicic JM; Winters C; Lagally K; Ho J; Robertson RJ; Wing RR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 May; 31(5):747-54. PubMed ID: 10331898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry.
    Haymes EM; Byrnes WC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Dec; 25(12):1365-9. PubMed ID: 8107543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of accelerometers with oxygen consumption in older adults during exercise.
    Fehling PC; Smith DL; Warner SE; Dalsky GP
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 Jan; 31(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 9927026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of an infrared LED device to measure heart rate and energy expenditure during rest and exercise.
    Lee CM; Gorelick M; Mendoza A
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Dec; 29(15):1645-53. PubMed ID: 21995327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure.
    Sasaki JE; Hickey A; Mavilia M; Tedesco J; John D; Kozey Keadle S; Freedson PS
    J Phys Act Health; 2015 Feb; 12(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24770438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validating accelerometry as a measure of physical activity and energy expenditure in chronic stroke.
    Serra MC; Balraj E; DiSanzo BL; Ivey FM; Hafer-Macko CE; Treuth MS; Ryan AS
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2017 Jan; 24(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 27322733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simplification of the method of assessing daily and nightly energy expenditure in children, using heart rate monitoring calibrated against open circuit indirect calorimetry.
    Beghin L; Budniok T; Vaksman G; Boussard-Delbecque L; Michaud L; Turck D; Gottrand F
    Clin Nutr; 2000 Dec; 19(6):425-35. PubMed ID: 11104594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry.
    Kumahara H; Schutz Y; Ayabe M; Yoshioka M; Yoshitake Y; Shindo M; Ishii K; Tanaka H
    Br J Nutr; 2004 Feb; 91(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 14756909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Energy Expenditure in Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy: Comparison of the SenseWear Armband and Indirect Calorimetry.
    Koehler K; Abel T; Wallmann-Sperlich B; Dreuscher A; Anneken V
    J Phys Act Health; 2015 Apr; 12(4):540-5. PubMed ID: 26125638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a multisensor armband in estimating energy expenditure in obese individuals.
    Papazoglou D; Augello G; Tagliaferri M; Savia G; Marzullo P; Maltezos E; Liuzzi A
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Dec; 14(12):2217-23. PubMed ID: 17189549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement between the Apple Series 1, LifeTrak Core C200, and Fitbit Charge HR with Indirect Calorimetry for Assessing Treadmill Energy Expenditure.
    Zhang P; Burns RD; Fu Y; Godin S; Byun W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31658628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of energy expenditure estimation by three activity monitors.
    Ryan J; Gormley J
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2013; 13(6):681-8. PubMed ID: 24251746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.