BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

766 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24007704)

  • 1. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?
    Sacks S; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of Online Information on Social Fertility Preservation.
    Shao YH; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 May; 42(5):561-567. PubMed ID: 31883752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal births after caesarean: what does Google think about it?
    Bantan N; Abenhaim HA
    Women Birth; 2015 Mar; 28(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 25458612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient-orientated web sites on laryngectomy: is their information readable?
    Pothier L; Pothier DD
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Nov; 18(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 19549174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Online information for women and their families regarding reduced fetal movements is of variable quality, readability and accountability.
    Farrant K; Heazell AEP
    Midwifery; 2016 Mar; 34():72-78. PubMed ID: 26867705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.
    Vives M; Young L; Sabharwal S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2826-31. PubMed ID: 19910867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
    Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer.
    Narwani V; Nalamada K; Lee M; Kothari P; Lakhani R
    Head Neck; 2016 Apr; 38(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 25491544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of websites that contain information relating to malaria in pregnancy.
    Hamwela V; Ahmed W; Bath PA
    Public Health; 2018 Apr; 157():50-52. PubMed ID: 29477789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.
    Thompson AE; Graydon SL
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A readability assessment of online stroke information.
    Sharma N; Tridimas A; Fitzsimmons PR
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(6):1362-7. PubMed ID: 24389374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implantation: An assessment of quality and readability of web-based information aimed at patients.
    Seymour N; Lakhani R; Hartley B; Cochrane L; Jephson C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):321-5. PubMed ID: 26154560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia.
    Fabricant PD; Dy CJ; Patel RM; Blanco JS; Doyle SM
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Jun; 33(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 23653022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet.
    Grewal P; Alagaratnam S
    Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 23523948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.