These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24008222)

  • 41. Variation of levels and distribution of N-nitrosamines in different seasons in drinking waters of East China.
    Li T; Yu D; Xian Q; Li A; Sun C
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Aug; 22(15):11792-800. PubMed ID: 25860554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
    Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cyclophosphamide removal from water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane.
    Wang L; Albasi C; Faucet-Marquis V; Pfohl-Leszkowicz A; Dorandeu C; Marion B; Causserand C
    Water Res; 2009 Sep; 43(17):4115-22. PubMed ID: 19592068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Full-scale simulation of seawater reverse osmosis desalination processes for boron removal: Effect of membrane fouling.
    Park PK; Lee S; Cho JS; Kim JH
    Water Res; 2012 Aug; 46(12):3796-804. PubMed ID: 22578430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling for the performance evaluation of pilot-scale hybrid nanofiltration (NF) & reverse osmosis (RO) membrane system for the treatment of brackish ground water.
    Srivastava A; K A; Nair A; Ram S; Agarwal S; Ali J; Singh R; Garg MC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 1):111497. PubMed ID: 33130432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessment of fouling mechanisms on reverse osmosis (RO) membrane during permeation of 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) solutions.
    Moreira CG; Santos HG; Bila DM; da Fonseca FV
    Environ Technol; 2022 Aug; 43(20):3084-3096. PubMed ID: 33843467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A new approach for optimization of small-scale RO membrane using artificial groundwater.
    Garg MC; Joshi H
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(21-24):2988-99. PubMed ID: 25189847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Occurrence and mass loads of N-nitrosamines discharged from different anthropogenic activities in Desheng River, South China.
    Xia J; Chen Y; Huang H; Li H; Huang D; Liang Y; Zeng H; Chen W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(20):57975-57988. PubMed ID: 36973615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Treatability of organic fractions derived from secondary effluent by reverse osmosis membrane.
    Hu JY; Ong SL; Shan JH; Kang JB; Ng WJ
    Water Res; 2003 Nov; 37(19):4801-9. PubMed ID: 14568067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Non-destructive approaches for assessing biofouling of household reverse osmosis membranes.
    Markwardt SD; Ronnie N; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2018 Aug; 34(7):740-752. PubMed ID: 30270657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comprehensive bench- and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis.
    Hancock NT; Xu P; Heil DM; Bellona C; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(19):8483-90. PubMed ID: 21838294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Biofiltration pretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in a water reclamation system.
    Hu JY; Song LF; Ong SL; Phua ET; Ng WJ
    Chemosphere; 2005 Mar; 59(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 15698653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review.
    Kang GD; Cao YM
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):584-600. PubMed ID: 22154112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessing granular media filtration for the removal of chemical contaminants from wastewater.
    Ho L; Grasset C; Hoefel D; Dixon MB; Leusch FD; Newcombe G; Saint CP; Brookes JD
    Water Res; 2011 May; 45(11):3461-72. PubMed ID: 21529882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of tertiary treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for water reuse in denim textile industry.
    Ben Amar N; Kechaou N; Palmeri J; Deratani A; Sghaier A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19497667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Recycled water: potential health risks from volatile organic compounds and use of 1,4-dichlorobenzene as treatment performance indicator.
    Rodriguez C; Linge K; Blair P; Busetti F; Devine B; Van Buynder P; Weinstein P; Cook A
    Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):93-106. PubMed ID: 22078226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
    Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
    Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.