These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24008222)

  • 61. Effect of conventional chemical treatment on the microbial population in a biofouling layer of reverse osmosis systems.
    Bereschenko LA; Prummel H; Euverink GJ; Stams AJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):405-16. PubMed ID: 21111441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Problems of operation and main reasons for failure of membranes in tertiary treatment systems.
    Lazarova V; Gallego S; García Molina V; Rougé P
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1777-84. PubMed ID: 18547930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Wastewater treatment with anaerobic membrane bioreactor and reverse osmosis.
    Grundestam J; Hellström D
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):211-7. PubMed ID: 17881855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
    Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Scale formation in NF/RO: mechanism and control.
    Lee S; Lee CH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):267-75. PubMed ID: 16003986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Minimal and zero liquid discharge with reverse osmosis using low-salt-rejection membranes.
    Wang Z; Deshmukh A; Du Y; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2020 Mar; 170():115317. PubMed ID: 31786394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Rapid field assessment of RO desalination of brackish agricultural drainage water.
    Thompson J; Rahardianto A; Gu H; Uchymiak M; Bartman A; Hedrick M; Lara D; Cooper J; Faria J; Christofides PD; Cohen Y
    Water Res; 2013 May; 47(8):2649-60. PubMed ID: 23538039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Repeated pressurization as a potential cause of deterioration in virus removal by aged reverse osmosis membrane used in households.
    Torii S; Hashimoto T; Do AT; Furumai H; Katayama H
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Dec; 695():133814. PubMed ID: 31421339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Reverse Osmosis Shifts Chloramine Speciation Causing Re-Formation of NDMA during Potable Reuse of Wastewater.
    McCurry DL; Ishida KP; Oelker GL; Mitch WA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Aug; 51(15):8589-8596. PubMed ID: 28671841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Assessment of the extent of bacterial growth in reverse osmosis system for improving drinking water quality.
    Park SK; Hu JY
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010; 45(8):968-77. PubMed ID: 20512722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Water reuse: >90% water yield in MBR/RO through concentrate recycling and CO2 addition as scaling control.
    Joss A; Baenninger C; Foa P; Koepke S; Krauss M; McArdell CS; Rottermann K; Wei Y; Zapata A; Siegrist H
    Water Res; 2011 Nov; 45(18):6141-51. PubMed ID: 21959090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Efficiency of RO/NF membranes at the removal of veterinary antibiotics.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Ašperger D; Košutić K
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22233911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A systematic approach towards optimization of brackish groundwater treatment using nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) hybrid membrane filtration system.
    Srivastava A; Singh R; Rajput VD; Minkina T; Agarwal S; Garg MC
    Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135230. PubMed ID: 35688189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Boron Can Be Used to Predict Trace Organic Rejection through Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Potable Reuse.
    Breitner LN; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(23):13871-13878. PubMed ID: 30444356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Pilot-scale multi-stage reverse osmosis (DT-RO) for water recovery from landfill leachate.
    Cingolani D; Fatone F; Frison N; Spinelli M; Eusebi AL
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():566-574. PubMed ID: 29551229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
    Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Assessment of online bacterial particle counts for monitoring the performance of reverse osmosis membrane process in potable reuse.
    Fujioka T; Makabe R; Mori N; Snyder SA; Leddy M
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 667():540-544. PubMed ID: 30833252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Monthly survey of N-nitrosamine yield in a conventional water treatment plant in North China.
    Wang C; Liu S; Wang J; Zhang X; Chen C
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Dec; 38():142-9. PubMed ID: 26702978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Treatment of agricultural wastewater and reuse.
    Reimann W
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(11-12):177-82. PubMed ID: 12523751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Short- and long-term fouling characteristics of reverse osmosis membrane at full scale leachate treatment plant.
    Rukapan W; Khananthai B; Chiemchaisri C; Chiemchaisri W; Srisukphun T
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 22173416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.