236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24009320)
1. How does variation in lower anterior face height influence perceived attractiveness? A quantitative investigation.
Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 24009320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of chin height on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, layperson, and clinician.
Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
Angle Orthod; 2012 Jan; 82(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21787197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the influence of asymmeftry affecting the mandible and chin point on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):192-206. PubMed ID: 21571417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the influence of chin prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician and layperson.
Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 41(7):839-46. PubMed ID: 22340990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.
Uchida Y; Motoyoshi M; Shigeeda T; Shinohara A; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Shimizu N
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 21262936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Facial height in Japanese-Brazilian descendants with normal occlusion.
Vieira FP; Pinzan A; Janson G; Fernandes TM; Sathler RC; Henriques RP
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):54-66. PubMed ID: 25715717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the influence of mandibular prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
Naini FB; Donaldson AN; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 34(6):738-46. PubMed ID: 21846874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ranking facial attractiveness.
Knight H; Keith O
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of chinese faces and its application in evaluating facial deformity.
Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Wu G; Zhou L; Wang B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1195-206. PubMed ID: 21050632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vertical facial height and proportions of face in Hausa - Fulani children in Northern Nigeria.
Utomi IL
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2004 Mar; 11(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15254569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
Shell TL; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cumulative frequency distribution in East Asian facial widths using the facial golden mask.
Lee JH; Kim TG; Park GW; Kim YH
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1378-82. PubMed ID: 19816261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Divine proportions in attractive and nonattractive faces.
Pancherz H; Knapp V; Erbe C; Heiss AM
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20209174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The occurrence of phi in dento-facial beauty of fine art from antiquity through the Renaissance.
Wiener RC; Wiener Pla RM
Eur J Esthet Dent; 2012; 7(4):440-52. PubMed ID: 23150872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in esthetic standards since 1940.
Berneburg M; Dietz K; Niederle C; Göz G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):450.e1-9; discussion 450-1. PubMed ID: 20362894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
