233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24009320)
21. The attractive lip: A photomorphometric analysis.
Penna V; Fricke A; Iblher N; Eisenhardt SU; Stark GB
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):920-9. PubMed ID: 25921652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Perception of facial profile attractiveness of lower anterior face height in orthodontic treatment seeking people].
Pham M; Wang Y; Wang W; Zhou C; Guo C; Bao B
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 31(4):385-8. PubMed ID: 23991578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measured symmetry of facial 3D shape and perceived facial symmetry and attractiveness before and after orthognathic surgery.
Ostwald J; Berssenbrügge P; Dirksen D; Runte C; Wermker K; Kleinheinz J; Jung S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 25841308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.
Michiels G; Sather AH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The aesthetic impact of upper lip inclination in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
Naini FB; Cobourne MT; McDonald F; Wertheim D
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 25016578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ideal proportions in full face front view, contemporary versus antique.
Mommaerts MY; Moerenhout BA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 20542444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.
Bozkir MG; Karakas P; Oguz O
Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Jun; 26(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 14625792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The relationship between the changes in three-dimensional facial morphology and mandibular movement after orthognathic surgery.
Kim DS; Huh KH; Lee SS; Heo MS; Choi SC; Hwang SJ; Yi WJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):686-93. PubMed ID: 23465640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contribution of malocclusion and female facial attractiveness to smile esthetics evaluated by eye tracking.
Richards MR; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Walther DB; Rosenstiel S; Sacksteder JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 25836007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of incisor inclination and anterior vertical facial height on facial attractiveness in an Asian woman.
Shoukat Ali U; Sukhia RH; Fida M; Kamal AT; Abbas A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Aug; 160(2):283-291. PubMed ID: 34006423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height.
Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 7942657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Change in cranio-cervical angulation following orthognathic surgery.
Savjani D; Wertheim D; Edler R
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 15947227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Do long-faced subjects really have a long anterior face? A longitudinal study.
Ha Y; Park YS; Lee SP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):799-806. PubMed ID: 24880851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The measurement of anterior and posterior facial heights in a Nigerian population.
Isiekwe M
Afr Dent J; 1994; 8():1-6. PubMed ID: 9590879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Differences between Caucasian and Asian attractive faces.
Rhee SC
Skin Res Technol; 2018 Feb; 24(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 28722243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Apr; 103(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 8480698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Soft tissue response and facial symmetry after orthognathic surgery.
Wermker K; Kleinheinz J; Jung S; Dirksen D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e339-45. PubMed ID: 24529350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ideal Facial Relationships and Goals.
Bueller H
Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Oct; 34(5):458-465. PubMed ID: 30296797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
