These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24009320)

  • 41. Influence of incisor inclination and anterior vertical facial height on facial attractiveness in an adult Asian male.
    Ali US; Sukhia RH; Fida M; Kamal AT; Abbas A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Mar; 161(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 34635397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. RELIABILITY OF VARIOUS SKELETAL INDICATORS IN ASSESSING VERTICAL FACIAL SOFT TISSUE PATTERN.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2016; 28(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 27323552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.
    Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A Quantitative Approach to Determining the Ideal Female Lip Aesthetic and Its Effect on Facial Attractiveness.
    Popenko NA; Tripathi PB; Devcic Z; Karimi K; Osann K; Wong BJF
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Jul; 19(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28208179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
    Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The frontal soft tissue changes in the lower facial portion after orthodontic treatment combined with anterior segmental osteotomy.
    Cha YM; Park NS; Bayome M; Han SH; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(3):232-41. PubMed ID: 22022694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Self-perception of the facial profile: an aid in treatment planning for orthognathic surgery.
    Bullen RN; Kook YA; Kim K; Park JH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 24342575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Exposure to 'ideal' facial images reduces facial satisfaction: an experimental study.
    Newton JT; Minhas G
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 16262608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Looking at the adult face].
    Behrents RG
    Orthod Fr; 1997; 68(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9432622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Craniofacial morphologic parameters in a Persian population: an anthropometric study.
    Amini F; Mashayekhi Z; Rahimi H; Morad G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1874-81. PubMed ID: 25203584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [A comparative study of cephalometric evaluation criteria of the cutaneous profile].
    De Coster T
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():559-72. PubMed ID: 1749613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Facial height comparison in young white and black Brazilian subjects with normal occlusion.
    de Freitas LM; Pinzan A; Janson G; Freitas KM; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):706.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17561045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults.
    Borman H; Ozgür F; Gürsu G
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Mar; 42(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 10096619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.
    Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Variability of the nasion-subnasal, subnasalgnathion, and bizygomatic distances of individuals of 6, 7, 11, and 15 years of age and their importance in the determination of the vertical dimension.
    Domitti SS; Daruge E; Francisco da Cruz V
    Aust Dent J; 1976 Jun; 21(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 1068688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparative study of the upper and lower vertical facial measurements of the Filipinos as it is used in the Willis method for determining the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Tina-Olaivar EO; Olaivar OK
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 50(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10202517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.