These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Key Variables for Effective eHealth Designs for Individuals With and Without Mental Health Disorders: 2^12-4 Fractional Factorial Experiment. Rotondi AJ; Grady J; Hanusa BH; Haas GL; Spring MR; Abebe KZ; Luther J; Gurklis J J Med Internet Res; 2021 Mar; 23(3):e23137. PubMed ID: 33759796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the exact null distribution of the generalised likelihood ratio test for analysing unreplicated factorial designs. Chen Y Biom J; 2005 Oct; 47(5):755-62. PubMed ID: 16385914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Design of experiments with multiple independent variables: a resource management perspective on complete and reduced factorial designs. Collins LM; Dziak JJ; Li R Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):202-24. PubMed ID: 19719358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol. Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic approach to designing statistically powerful heteroscedastic 2 × 2 factorial studies while minimizing financial costs. Jan SL; Shieh G BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):114. PubMed ID: 27578357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factorial versus multi-arm multi-stage designs for clinical trials with multiple treatments. Jaki T; Vasileiou D Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(4):563-580. PubMed ID: 27804166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The power of approximate degrees of freedom tests in heteroscedastic factorial designs. Jan SL; Shieh G Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):871-83. PubMed ID: 25123908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inferring median survival differences in general factorial designs via permutation tests. Ditzhaus M; Dobler D; Pauly M Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Mar; 30(3):875-891. PubMed ID: 33349152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimized multi-stage designs controlling the false discovery or the family-wise error rate. Zehetmayer S; Bauer P; Posch M Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4145-60. PubMed ID: 18444249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An examination of effect estimation in factorial and standardly-tailored designs. Allore HG; Murphy TE Clin Trials; 2008; 5(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 18375650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factorial and reciprocal control designs. Byar DP Stat Med; 1990; 9(1-2):55-63; discussion 63-4. PubMed ID: 2345838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs. Oron AP; Hoff PD Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 23345304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of nonregular fractional factorial designs in combination toxicity studies. Phoa FK; Xu H; Wong WK Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 47(9):2183-8. PubMed ID: 19505524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Raw Data Visualization for Common Factorial Designs Using SPSS: A Syntax Collection and Tutorial. Loffing F Front Psychol; 2022; 13():808469. PubMed ID: 35432129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]