976 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24009950)
1. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Medical Diagnostic Test Evaluation.
Hajian-Tilaki K
Caspian J Intern Med; 2013; 4(2):627-35. PubMed ID: 24009950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers.
Kumar R; Indrayan A
Indian Pediatr; 2011 Apr; 48(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 21532099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians.
Nahm FS
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2022 Feb; 75(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 35124947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves.
Akobeng AK
Acta Paediatr; 2007 May; 96(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 17376185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value.
Çorbacıoğlu ŞK; Aksel G
Turk J Emerg Med; 2023; 23(4):195-198. PubMed ID: 38024184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists.
Park SH; Goo JM; Jo CH
Korean J Radiol; 2004; 5(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 15064554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical meaning of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve for the evaluation of the performance of disease markers.
Parodi S; Verda D; Bagnasco F; Muselli M
Epidemiol Health; 2022; 44():e2022088. PubMed ID: 36265519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.
Obuchowski NA
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias.
He H; Lyness JM; McDermott MP
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 18680124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tournament leave-pair-out cross-validation for receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Montoya Perez I; Airola A; Boström PJ; Jambor I; Pahikkala T
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):2975-2991. PubMed ID: 30126322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Receiver operating characteristic analysis under tree orderings of disease classes.
Wang D; Attwood K; Tian L
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1907-26. PubMed ID: 26678355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semi-parametric area under the curve regression method for diagnostic studies with ordinal data.
Rajan KB; Zhou XH
Biom J; 2012 Jan; 54(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 22161961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A computer program for non-parametric receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Vida S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1993 Jun; 40(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 8370283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new concordant partial AUC and partial c statistic for imbalanced data in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms.
Carrington AM; Fieguth PW; Qazi H; Holzinger A; Chen HH; Mayr F; Manuel DG
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jan; 20(1):4. PubMed ID: 31906931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of the optimal cut-off value of serum prostate-specific antigen in the prediction of skeletal metastases on technetium-99m whole-body bone scan by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Manohar PR; Rather TA; Khan SH
World J Nucl Med; 2020; 19(3):255-259. PubMed ID: 33354181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Partial Youden index and its inferences.
Li C; Chen J; Qin G
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 30359546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative diagnostic test evaluation of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in suspected bloodstream infections in children with cancer.
R Nath S; Jayapalan S; Nair H; Kusumakumary P; Prema NS; Priyakumari T; Rajamohanan K
J Med Microbiol; 2017 May; 66(5):622-627. PubMed ID: 28504925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
