These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study. Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systems-based modelling approach using transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) specimens yielded incremental prognostic significance to Gleason when predicting long-term outcome in men with localized prostate cancer. Donovan MJ; Khan FM; Bayer-Zubek V; Powell D; Costa J; Cordon-Cardo C BJU Int; 2012 Jan; 109(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 21733075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative Time-Resolved Fluorescence Imaging of Androgen Receptor and Prostate-Specific Antigen in Prostate Tissue Sections. Krzyzanowska A; Lippolis G; Helczynski L; Anand A; Peltola M; Pettersson K; Lilja H; Bjartell A J Histochem Cytochem; 2016 May; 64(5):311-22. PubMed ID: 27026295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic Multi-Stain Registration of Whole Slide Images in Histopathology. Shafique A; Babaie M; Sajadi M; Batten A; Skdar S; Tizhoosh HR Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():3622-3625. PubMed ID: 34892022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of Deep Learning to Develop and Analyze Computational Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Prostate Core Biopsy Images for Tumor Diagnosis. Rana A; Lowe A; Lithgow M; Horback K; Janovitz T; Da Silva A; Tsai H; Shanmugam V; Bayat A; Shah P JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e205111. PubMed ID: 32432709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of prostate cancer by alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) in needle biopsy specimens previously reported as negative for malignancy. Carswell BM; Woda BA; Wang X; Li C; Dresser K; Jiang Z Histopathology; 2006 May; 48(6):668-73. PubMed ID: 16681682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens. Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How often does alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase contribute to resolving an atypical diagnosis on prostate needle biopsy beyond that provided by basal cell markers? Zhou M; Aydin H; Kanane H; Epstein JI Am J Surg Pathol; 2004 Feb; 28(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 15043314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Epithelium segmentation using deep learning in H&E-stained prostate specimens with immunohistochemistry as reference standard. Bulten W; Bándi P; Hoven J; Loo RV; Lotz J; Weiss N; Laak JV; Ginneken BV; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):864. PubMed ID: 30696866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images. Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immunohistochemical expression of Ets-related gene-transcriptional factor in adenocarcinoma prostate and its correlation with Gleason score. Mannan R; Bhasin TS; Manjari M; Singh G; Bhatia PK; Sharma S Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2016; 59(4):489-495. PubMed ID: 27721279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study. Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated approach for estimation of grade groups for prostate cancer based on histological image feature analysis. Hossain A; Arimura H; Kinoshita F; Ninomiya K; Watanabe S; Imada K; Koyanagi R; Oda Y Prostate; 2020 Feb; 80(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 31868968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing histologic evaluation of prostate tissue using nonlinear microscopy and paraffin H&E: a pilot study. Cahill LC; Fujimoto JG; Giacomelli MG; Yoshitake T; Wu Y; Lin DI; Ye H; Carrasco-Zevallos OM; Wagner AA; Rosen S Mod Pathol; 2019 Jul; 32(8):1158-1167. PubMed ID: 30914763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative determination of expression of the prostate cancer protein alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase using automated quantitative analysis (AQUA): a novel paradigm for automated and continuous biomarker measurements. Rubin MA; Zerkowski MP; Camp RL; Kuefer R; Hofer MD; Chinnaiyan AM; Rimm DL Am J Pathol; 2004 Mar; 164(3):831-40. PubMed ID: 14982837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation. Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies. Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy. Mansouri N; Msakni I; Gargouri F; Khiari R; Bouziani A; Laabidi B Tunis Med; 2018 Jul; 96(7):430-436. PubMed ID: 30430487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. p63/AMACR antibody cocktail restaining of prostate needle biopsy tissues after transfer to charged slides: a viable approach in the diagnosis of small atypical foci that are lost on block sectioning. Hameed O; Humphrey PA Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Nov; 124(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 16203278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]