These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing: a systematic review. Moloney NA; Hall TM; Doody CM J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):191-207. PubMed ID: 22773522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A population-based study of quantitative sensory testing in adolescents with and without chronic pain. Tham SW; Palermo TM; Holley AL; Zhou C; Stubhaug A; Furberg AS; Nielsen CS Pain; 2016 Dec; 157(12):2807-2815. PubMed ID: 27780176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The long-term reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in healthy individuals. Marcuzzi A; Wrigley PJ; Dean CM; Adams R; Hush JM Pain; 2017 Jul; 158(7):1217-1223. PubMed ID: 28328574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative Sensory Testing in pain assesment and treatment. Brief review and algorithmic management proposal. Avellanal M; Riquelme I; Díaz-Regañón G Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed); 2020 Apr; 67(4):187-194. PubMed ID: 32113579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and electrophysiologic correlates of quantitative sensory testing in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Hayes KC; Wolfe DL; Hsieh JT; Potter PJ; Krassioukov A; Durham CE Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Nov; 83(11):1612-9. PubMed ID: 12422334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis. Olesen SS; van Goor H; Bouwense SA; Wilder-Smith OH; Drewes AM Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2012; 37(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 22854397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neurophysiologic and quantitative sensory testing in the diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathy and neuropathic pain. Jääskeläinen SK; Teerijoki-Oksa T; Forssell H Pain; 2005 Oct; 117(3):349-357. PubMed ID: 16153774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of quantitative sensory testing in the evaluation of musculoskeletal pain conditions. Pavlaković G; Petzke F Curr Rheumatol Rep; 2010 Dec; 12(6):455-61. PubMed ID: 20857243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quantitative sensory testing for neuropathic pain and its relevance for physiotherapy]. Adler M; Taxer B Schmerz; 2022 Dec; 36(6):437-446. PubMed ID: 34424391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of Self-reported Pain Measures Between Sensory Phenotypes in HIV-associated Sensory Neuropathy. Kemp HI; Vollert J; Davies NWS; Moyle GJ; Rice ASC J Pain; 2023 Jan; 24(1):112-127. PubMed ID: 36116766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Test-retest studies in quantitative sensory testing: a critical review. Werner MU; Petersen MA; Bischoff JM Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Sep; 57(8):957-63. PubMed ID: 23826705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative Sensory Testing to Predict Postoperative Pain. Braun M; Bello C; Riva T; Hönemann C; Doll D; Urman RD; Luedi MM Curr Pain Headache Rep; 2021 Jan; 25(1):3. PubMed ID: 33443676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of conditioned pain modulation on trigeminal somatosensory function evaluated by quantitative sensory testing. Oono Y; Baad-Hansen L; Wang K; Arendt-Nielsen L; Svensson P Pain; 2013 Dec; 154(12):2684-2690. PubMed ID: 23911699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences and similarities between atypical facial pain and trigeminal neuropathic pain. Forssell H; Tenovuo O; Silvoniemi P; Jääskeläinen SK Neurology; 2007 Oct; 69(14):1451-9. PubMed ID: 17909158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]