310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24010900)
1. Clinically important deterioration in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a choice of evaluation methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and pain scales: clinical article.
Gum JL; Glassman SD; Carreon LY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):564-8. PubMed ID: 24010900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries.
Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Canan CE; Burke LO; Djurasovic M; Glassman SD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 23157276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.
Glassman SD; Copay AG; Berven SH; Polly DW; Subach BR; Carreon LY
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1839-47. PubMed ID: 18762642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Mendenhall SK; Zuckerman SL; Shau DN; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24785973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.
Copay AG; Martin MM; Subach BR; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Schuler TC; Berven S
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20171937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of complications within 90 days on patient-reported outcomes 3 months and 12 months following elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Sielatycki JA; Asher AL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E8. PubMed ID: 26621422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive study of back and leg pain improvements after adult spinal deformity surgery: analysis of 421 patients with 2-year follow-up and of the impact of the surgery on treatment satisfaction.
Scheer JK; Smith JS; Clark AJ; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Rolston JD; Eastlack R; Hart RA; Protopsaltis TS; Kelly MP; Kebaish K; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Hostin R; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Ames CP;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):540-53. PubMed ID: 25700238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in the Oswestry Disability Index that predict improvement after lumbar fusion.
Djurasovic M; Glassman SD; Dimar JR; Crawford CH; Bratcher KR; Carreon LY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Nov; 17(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 22998402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?
Parker SL; Asher AL; Godil SS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E17. PubMed ID: 26621415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion complicated by deep wound infection: a case-control study.
Petilon JM; Glassman SD; Dimar JR; Carreon LY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1370-4. PubMed ID: 22261633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
