BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2007 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24010901)

  • 1. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
    Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.
    Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.
    Radcliff K; Coric D; Albert T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 27015130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up.
    Jackson RJ; Davis RJ; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Hisey MS; Kim KD; Gaede SE; Nunley PD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):734-45. PubMed ID: 26799118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc.
    Coric D; Guyer RD; Nunley PD; Musante D; Carmody C; Gordon C; Lauryssen C; Boltes MO; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 29303467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months.
    Gornet MF; Lanman TH; Burkus JK; Hodges SD; McConnell JR; Dryer RF; Copay AG; Nian H; Harrell FE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):653-667. PubMed ID: 28304237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.
    Coric D; Kim PK; Clemente JD; Boltes MO; Nussbaum M; James S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23140129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Cervical Total Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion: Results at 48 Months Follow-up.
    Hisey MS; Bae HW; Davis RJ; Gaede S; Hoffman G; Kim KD; Nunley PD; Peterson D; Rashbaum RF; Stokes J; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 May; 28(4):E237-43. PubMed ID: 25310394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.
    Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
    Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article.
    Coric D; Nunley PD; Guyer RD; Musante D; Carmody CN; Gordon CR; Lauryssen C; Ohnmeiss DD; Boltes MO
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Oct; 15(4):348-58. PubMed ID: 21699471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term Evaluation of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with the Mobi-C© Cervical Disc: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial with Seven-Year Follow-up.
    Radcliff K; Davis RJ; Hisey MS; Nunley PD; Hoffman GA; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Albert T; Coric D
    Int J Spine Surg; 2017; 11(4):31. PubMed ID: 29372135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of 1- and 2-Level Total Disc Replacement: Four-Year Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter IDE Clinical Trial.
    Bae HW; Kim KD; Nunley PD; Jackson RJ; Hisey MS; Davis RJ; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Peterson DL; Stokes JM; Araghi A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(11):759-66. PubMed ID: 25785955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.
    Hou Y; Liu Y; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen H; Yang L; Zhang Y
    Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 24076441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
    Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.
    Coric D; Cassis J; Carew JD; Boltes MO
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 21121748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study comparing cervical disc replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion.
    Zhang HX; Shao YD; Chen Y; Hou Y; Cheng L; Si M; Nie L
    Int Orthop; 2014 Dec; 38(12):2533-41. PubMed ID: 25209344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heterotopic ossification following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results from the prospective, multicenter, historically controlled trial comparing allograft to an optimized dose of rhBMP-2.
    Arnold PM; Anderson KK; Selim A; Dryer RF; Kenneth Burkus J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 27129045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of One-level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results at 5-year Follow-up.
    Hisey MS; Zigler JE; Jackson R; Nunley PD; Bae HW; Kim KD; Ohnmeiss DD
    Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():10. PubMed ID: 27162712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 101.