171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24010986)
1. Buccal injection of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine for the removal of maxillary third molars.
Yadav S; Verma A; Sachdeva A
Anesth Prog; 2013; 60(3):95-8. PubMed ID: 24010986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?
Uckan S; Dayangac E; Araz K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):733-5. PubMed ID: 17138173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is palatal injection mandatory prior to extraction of permanent maxillary tooth: a preliminary study.
Sekhar GR; Nagaraju T; ; Nandagopal V; Sudheer R;
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):100-2. PubMed ID: 21525686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia.
Luqman U; Majeed Janjua OS; Ashfaq M; Irfan H; Mushtaq S; Bilal A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 25772957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.
Fan S; Chen WL; Yang ZH; Huang ZQ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 18996033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
Majid OW; Ahmed AM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction.
Bataineh AB; Nusair YM; Al-Rahahleh RQ
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3239-3248. PubMed ID: 30417227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Feasibility of permanent maxillary tooth removal using articaine anesthesia without palatal injection].
Peng M; Zhu ZM; Yang XM
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 26(4):416-8. PubMed ID: 18780504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of intraoral injection discomfort produced by plain and epinephrine-containing lidocaine local anesthetic solutions: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, volunteer investigation.
Meechan JG; Day PF
Anesth Prog; 2002; 49(2):44-8. PubMed ID: 15384291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of posterior superior alveolar nerve blocks, buccal infiltrations, and buccal plus palatal infiltrations in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Miglani S; Ansari I; Kohli S
J Endod; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1491-4. PubMed ID: 22000449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transpapillary versus palatal injection technique for maxillary tooth extractions.
Janjua OS; Luqman U; Ibrahim MW; Shah I
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Mar; 22(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 22414352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1 : 100,000 and 1 : 200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: a pilot study.
Lima JL; Dias-Ribeiro E; Ferreira-Rocha J; Soares R; Costa FW; Fan S; Sant'ana E
Anesth Prog; 2013; 60(2):42-5. PubMed ID: 23763558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is it possible to extract primary maxillary molars without palatal injection?: a controlled clinical trial.
Tuğutlu EC; Sancak K
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Feb; 28(3):174. PubMed ID: 38407635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine HCl with different epinephrine concentration for local anesthesia in participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase IV trial.
Karm MH; Park FD; Kang M; Kim HJ; Kang JW; Kim S; Kim YD; Kim CH; Seo KS; Kwon KH; Kim CH; Lee JW; Hong SW; Lim MH; Nam SK; Cho JM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 May; 96(21):e6753. PubMed ID: 28538371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children.
Mittal M; Sharma S; Kumar A; Chopra R; Srivastava D
Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 26883609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Articaine use does not routinely eliminate the need for palatal injections for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized cross-over clinical trial.
Bahrololoomi Z; Maghsoudi N
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):603-611. PubMed ID: 34853915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the effectiveness of lidocaine in permanent maxillary teeth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.
Kumaresan R; Srinivasan B; Pendayala S
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2015 Jun; 14(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 26028844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PSA block for maxillary molar's anesthesia - an obsolete technique?
Padhye M; Gupta S; Chandiramani G; Bali R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):e39-43. PubMed ID: 21925909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A blinded randomized controlled trial comparing lignocaine and placebo administration to the palate for removal of maxillary third molars.
Badcock ME; Gordon I; McCullough MJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 36(12):1177-82. PubMed ID: 18022350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]