These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24011479)

  • 1. The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validity.
    Corrigan PW; Salzer MS
    Eval Program Plann; 2003 May; 26(2):109-21. PubMed ID: 24011479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of treatment preferences on validity: a review.
    Sidani S; Miranda J; Epstein D; Fox M
    Can J Nurs Res; 2009 Dec; 41(4):52-67. PubMed ID: 20191713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of participant preferences in unblinded randomized controlled trials.
    Floyd AH; Moyer A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2010 Jun; 5(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 20569152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing the validity and utility of randomized clinical trials in addictions treatment research: II. Participant samples and assessment.
    Del Boca FK; Darkes J
    Addiction; 2007 Aug; 102(8):1194-203. PubMed ID: 17511752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preference in random assignment: implications for the interpretation of randomized trials.
    Macias C; Gold PB; Hargreaves WA; Aronson E; Bickman L; Barreira PJ; Jones DR; Rodican CF; Fisher WH
    Adm Policy Ment Health; 2009 Sep; 36(5):331-42. PubMed ID: 19434489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Issues in subject recruitment and retention with pregnant and parenting substance-abusing women.
    Howard J; Beckwith L
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1996; 166():68-86. PubMed ID: 8818166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity.
    Godwin M; Ruhland L; Casson I; MacDonald S; Delva D; Birtwhistle R; Lam M; Seguin R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Dec; 3():28. PubMed ID: 14690550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metaphor use and health literacy: a pilot study of strategies to explain randomization in cancer clinical trials.
    Krieger JL; Parrott RL; Nussbaum JF
    J Health Commun; 2011 Jan; 16(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 21128152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Appraisal of primary outcome measures used in trials of patient decision support.
    Kryworuchko J; Stacey D; Bennett C; Graham ID
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 18701235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relation of patients' treatment preferences to outcome in a randomized clinical trial.
    Leykin Y; Derubeis RJ; Gallop R; Amsterdam JD; Shelton RC; Hollon SD
    Behav Ther; 2007 Sep; 38(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 17697846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hypertensive patients' willingness to participate in placebo-controlled trials: implications for recruitment efficiency.
    Halpern SD; Karlawish JH; Casarett D; Berlin JA; Townsend RR; Asch DA
    Am Heart J; 2003 Dec; 146(6):985-92. PubMed ID: 14660989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conducting a two-stage preference trial: utility and challenges.
    Sidani S; Fox M; Epstein D
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2015 May; 52(5):1017-24. PubMed ID: 25736207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.
    Gail MH; Mark SD; Carroll RJ; Green SB; Pee D
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1069-92. PubMed ID: 8804140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating preference trials of oral phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction.
    Mulhall JP; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol; 2006 Jan; 49(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 16263207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized clinical trials: is periodontal research good for patients?
    Williams KB; Glaros A; Walker MP; Cobb CM
    Periodontol 2000; 2012 Jun; 59(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22507058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of primary care depression intervention on employment and workplace conflict outcomes: is value added?
    Smith JL; Rost KM; Nutting PA; Libby AM; Elliott CE; Pyne JM
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 12529569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allocation of patients to treatment in clinical trials.
    Pocock SJ
    Biometrics; 1979 Mar; 35(1):183-97. PubMed ID: 497334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies for balancing internal and external validity in evaluations of interventions.
    Fredericks S; Sidani S; Fox M; Miranda J
    Nurse Res; 2019 Dec; 27(4):19-23. PubMed ID: 31578832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of study design in clinical trials for bladder cancer.
    Tannock IF
    Urol Clin North Am; 1992 Nov; 19(4):655-62. PubMed ID: 1441023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.