These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24011496)

  • 21. Two-year clinical performance of self-etching adhesive systems in composite restorations of anterior teeth.
    Barcellos DC; Batista GR; Silva MA; Pleffken PR; Rangel PM; Fernandes VV; Di Nicoló R; Torres CR
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23110580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A six-year prospective randomized study of a nano-hybrid and a conventional hybrid resin composite in Class II restorations.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2013 Feb; 29(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 23063254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12744410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of a two-step etch&rinse and a two-step self-etch adhesive system in Class II restorations: two-year results.
    Ermis RB; Kam O; Celik EU; Temel UB
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):656-63. PubMed ID: 19953774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Four-year clinical evaluation of Class II nano-hybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Dent; 2011 Jan; 39(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 20933047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A calcium aluminate cement as restorative material in Class V cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(3):111-8. PubMed ID: 15506688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial.
    Barabanti N; Gagliani M; Roulet JF; Testori T; Ozcan M; Cerutti A
    J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 23454329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW; Halken J; Hallonsten AL; Höigaard R
    J Dent; 2013 Apr; 41(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 23228499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions.
    Ozel E; Say EC; Yurdaguven H; Soyman M
    Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun; 55(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 20604757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
    Shi L; Wang X; Zhao Q; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Ren Y; Chen Z
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Five-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Van Landuyt KL; De Munck J; Ermis RB; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 May; 18(4):1045-1052. PubMed ID: 23949016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical performance of a self-etching and a total-etch adhesive system - 2-year results.
    Bekes K; Boeckler L; Gernhardt CR; Schaller HG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 34(11):855-61. PubMed ID: 17919253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Four-year clinical evaluation of two self-etching dentin adhesives of different pH values used to restore non-retentive cervical lesions.
    Söderholm KJ; Ottenga M; Nimmo S
    Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 23724546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 10-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive system.
    Akimoto N; Takamizu M; Momoi Y
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 17288322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.