BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24011501)

  • 1. Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.
    Potter S; Chambers A; Govindajulu S; Sahu A; Warr R; Cawthorn S
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 24011501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre.
    Barber MD; Williams L; Anderson ED; Neades GT; Raine C; Young O; Kulkarni D; Young I; Dixon JM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 25238954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acellular dermal matrices as an adjunct to implant breast reconstruction: Analysis of outcomes and complications.
    Tasoulis MK; Teoh V; Khan A; Montgomery C; Mohammed K; Gui G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):511-515. PubMed ID: 31706716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Versus Without ADM.
    Ng TP; Loo BYK; Yong N; Chia CLK; Lohsiriwat V
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):3366-3376. PubMed ID: 38285304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - A prospective randomized trial.
    Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Schrenk P; Bjelic-Radisic V; Unterrieder K; Leser C; Fink-Retter A; Salama M; Singer C
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 42(5):665-71. PubMed ID: 26947961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of resource utilisation of single stage porcine acellular dermal matrix assisted breast reconstruction: A comparative study.
    Kilchenmann AJ; Lardi AM; Ho-Asjoe M; Junge K; Farhadi J
    Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):876-82. PubMed ID: 25311295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review protocol.
    Cook H; Zargaran D; Glynou SP; Hamilton S; Mosahebi A
    Syst Rev; 2024 Jun; 13(1):153. PubMed ID: 38849880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction with Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Craig ES; Clemens MW; Koshy JC; Wren J; Hong Z; Butler CE; Garvey PB; Selber JC; Kronowitz SJ
    Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Feb; 39(3):279-288. PubMed ID: 29800083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
    Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of an evidence-based approach to the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Ganesh Kumar N; Berlin NL; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Wilkins EG
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Jan; 74(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 33172826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A retrospective review of submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction: The influence of dermal matrix (ADM) on complications and aesthetic outcomes.
    Kelley RS; Duraes EFR; Scomacao IR; Van Dijck P; Fahradyan V; Rambhia S; Moreira AA; Djohan RS; Schwarz GS; Bernard SL
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Nov; 75(11):4117-4124. PubMed ID: 36117132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.
    Chandarana M; Harries S;
    BJS Open; 2020 Feb; 4(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 32011819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix-Based Breast Reconstruction in Previously Irradiated Breasts: Complications and Outcomes From a Single-Center Experience.
    Lisa A; Carbonaro R; Bottoni M; Ostapenko E; Rietjens M
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Dec; 91(6):686-692. PubMed ID: 37624913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prophylactic antibiotic use in acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Mazari F; Wattoo GM; Kazzazi NH; Kolar KM; Olubowale OO; Rogers CE; Azmy IA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2021 Mar; 103(3):186-190. PubMed ID: 33645273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
    Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix Increase Postoperative Complications of the First-Stage Reconstruction of Immediate Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Woo KJ; Park JW; Mun GH; Pyon JK; Jeon BJ; Bang SI
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Oct; 79(4):341-345. PubMed ID: 28509694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix.
    Bank J; Phillips NA; Park JE; Song DH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Dec; 37(6):1194-201. PubMed ID: 24091489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Analysis of Sterile Freeze-Dried Versus Sterile Pre-Hydration Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Park KC; Park ES; Cha HG; Kim SY
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Oct; 47(5):1671-1677. PubMed ID: 33959782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dermal Autograft Using Donor Breast as Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Review.
    North WD; Kubajak CS; St Martin B; Rinker B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 78(6S Suppl 5):S282-S285. PubMed ID: 28296716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.