BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24011538)

  • 1. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Lange A; Prenzler A; Frank M; Kirstein M; Vogel A; von der Schulenburg JM
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 24011538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(25):1-49. PubMed ID: 23074403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic Evaluation of Monoclonal Antibodies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.
    Koilakou S; Petrou P
    Mol Diagn Ther; 2021 Nov; 25(6):715-734. PubMed ID: 34816395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Lange A; Prenzler A; Frank M; Golpon H; Welte T; von der Schulenburg JM
    BMC Pulm Med; 2014 Dec; 14():192. PubMed ID: 25471553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
    Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
    J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of pharmacogenomic profiling prior to pharmaceutical treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer on cost effectiveness : a systematic review.
    Frank M; Mittendorf T
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Mar; 31(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 23338963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies in the First-line Treatment of RAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.
    Morimoto T; Fujito K; Yamasaki B; Goto R
    Clin Ther; 2023 Jan; 45(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 36641260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy.
    Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG
    Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NICE guidance on cetuximab, bevacizumab, and panitumumab for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy.
    Rinaldi F; George E; Adler AI
    Lancet Oncol; 2012 Mar; 13(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 22489288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab) in Combination with Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    da Silva WC; de Araujo VE; Lima EMEA; Dos Santos JBR; Silva MRRD; Almeida PHRF; de Assis Acurcio F; Godman B; Kurdi A; Cherchiglia ML; Andrade EIG
    BioDrugs; 2018 Dec; 32(6):585-606. PubMed ID: 30499082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-minimization analysis of panitumumab compared with cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Fakih MG; Knox HN; Maglinte GA; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Schwartzberg LS
    J Med Econ; 2015; 18(8):619-28. PubMed ID: 25822327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
    Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.
    Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
    Clin Ther; 2007 Oct; 29(10):2256-67. PubMed ID: 18042483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review.
    Tol J; Punt CJ
    Clin Ther; 2010 Mar; 32(3):437-53. PubMed ID: 20399983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.