363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24012518)
1. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
Dowling AH; Burns A; Macauley D; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
Burns A; Dowling AH; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using Little's Irregularity Index in orthodontics: outdated and inaccurate?
Macauley D; Garvey TM; Dowling AH; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1127-33. PubMed ID: 23000526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Little's irregularity index: photographic assessment vs study model assessment.
Almasoud N; Bearn D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):787-94. PubMed ID: 21130338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure.
Rajshekar M; Julian R; Williams AM; Tennant M; Forrest A; Walsh LJ; Wilson G; Blizzard L
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of the buccolingual inclination of teeth: manual technique vs 3-dimensional software.
Nouri M; Abdi AH; Farzan A; Mokhtarpour F; Baghban AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 25263155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.
Sousa MV; Vasconcelos EC; Janson G; Garib D; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points.
Jacquet W; Nyssen E; Ibel G; Vannet BV
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23785935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios by digitization, and comparison with the traditional method.
Paredes V; Gandia JL; Cibrian R
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 16373454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examination of Bolton Index comparing the traditional method with a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
Roşu S; Zetu I; Ogodescu A; Veiszenbacher E; Mártha KI
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014; 118(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 24741801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine.
Nouri M; Farzan A; Baghban AR; Massudi R
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 25741826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital images as an alternative to orthodontic casts in assessing malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need.
Mok CW; Zhou L; McGrath C; Hägg U; Bendeus M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Nov; 65(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 18071959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
