These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24012518)

  • 41. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
    Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
    Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Traditional plaster casts and dental digital models: intra-examiner reliability of measurements.
    Mangiacapra R; Butti AC; Salvato A; Biagi R
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 20545091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effect of extraction of third molars on late lower incisor crowding: a randomized controlled trial.
    Harradine NW; Pearson MH; Toth B
    Br J Orthod; 1998 May; 25(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 9668994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Miasiro Junior H; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO
    Braz Oral Res; 2009; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19893964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities of 3-dimensional orthodontic digital setups.
    Fabels LN; Nijkamp PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 25432262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reliability of Cusp Angulation Using Three-Dimensional Digital Models: A Preliminary In Vitro Study.
    Liu X; Chen X
    Methods Inf Med; 2022 Sep; 61(3-04):90-98. PubMed ID: 35668665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
    Cha BK; Lee JY; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yoshida N
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 17513876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of maxillary arch morphology in children with unilaterally impacted incisors via three-dimensional analysis of digital dental casts: a controlled study.
    Pavoni C; Franchi L; Buongiorno M; Cozza P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 26747661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Correlation between the individual and the combined width of the six maxillary anterior teeth.
    Gonçalves LC; Gomes VL; De Lima Lucas B; Monteiro SB
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(3):182-91; discussion 192. PubMed ID: 19508262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility.
    Dalstra M; Melsen B
    J Orthod; 2009 Mar; 36(1):36-41; discussion 14. PubMed ID: 19286874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reliability, reproducibility and validity of the conventional buccolingual and mesiodistal measurements on 3D dental digital models obtained from intra-oral 3D scanner.
    Soto-Álvarez C; Fonseca GM; Viciano J; Alemán I; Rojas-Torres J; Zúñiga MH; López-Lázaro S
    Arch Oral Biol; 2020 Jan; 109():104575. PubMed ID: 31589998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influence of standardization on the precision (reproducibility) of dental cast analysis with virtual 3-dimensional models.
    Hayashi K; Chung O; Park S; Lee SP; Sachdeva RC; Mizoguchi I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 25726405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Intra- and inter-examiner reliability of intraoral malocclusion assessment.
    Ovsenik M; Farcnik F; Verdenik I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 17290020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of linear measurements and analyses taken from plaster models and three-dimensional images.
    Porto BG; Porto TS; Silva MB; Grehs RA; Pinto Ados S; Bhandi SH; Tonetto MR; Bandéca MC; dos Santos-Pinto LA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 25825090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of 3-dimensional tooth crown size in cleft lip and palate patients.
    Akcam MO; Toygar TU; Ozer L; Ozdemir B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 18617107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study.
    Cuperus AM; Harms MC; Rangel FA; Bronkhorst EM; Schols JG; Breuning KH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Sep; 142(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 22920696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Development and evaluation of a digital dental modeling method based on grating projection and reverse engineering software.
    Zhou Q; Wang Z; Chen J; Song J; Chen L; Lu Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 26384536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they?
    Abizadeh N; Moles DR; O'Neill J; Noar JH
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):151-9. PubMed ID: 22984099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis.
    Koretsi V; Tingelhoff L; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 28531341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.