These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24012783)

  • 1. Timing in a variable interval procedure: evidence for a memory singularity.
    Matell MS; Kim JS; Hartshorne L
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jan; 101():49-57. PubMed ID: 24012783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shifts in the psychophysical function in rats.
    Guilhardi P; Macinnis ML; Church RM; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 17360131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus compounding in interval timing: the modality-duration relationship of the anchor durations results in qualitatively different response patterns to the compound cue.
    Swanton DN; Matell MS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 20718546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hippocampus, time, and memory.
    Meck WH; Church RM; Olton DS
    Behav Neurosci; 1984 Feb; 98(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 6696797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of an intruded event on peak-interval timing in rats: isolation of a postcue effect.
    Brown BL; Richer P; Doyère V
    Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 17161921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reinforcement probability modulates temporal memory selection and integration processes.
    Matell MS; Kurti AN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():80-91. PubMed ID: 23896560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased generalization in a peak procedure after delayed reinforcement.
    Buriticá J; Alcalá E
    Behav Processes; 2019 Dec; 169():103978. PubMed ID: 31580905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applications of timing theories to a peak procedure.
    Yi L
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 17446012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rats can learn a temporal task in a single session.
    Reyes MB; de Miranda DH; Tunes GC; Cravo AM; Caetano MS
    Behav Processes; 2020 Jan; 170():103986. PubMed ID: 31783298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impulsive responding on the peak-interval procedure.
    Matell MS; Portugal GS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 17023122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of scalar timing theory to individual trials.
    Church RM; Meck WH; Gibbon J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Apr; 20(2):135-55. PubMed ID: 8189184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of multiple temporal memories in the peak-interval procedure.
    Wilson AG; Matell MS; Crystal JD
    Learn Behav; 2015 Jun; 43(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 25731983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fos expression in the prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum after exposure to a free-operant timing schedule.
    Valencia-Torres L; Olarte-Sánchez CM; Body S; Cheung TH; Fone KC; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Dec; 235(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 22917527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sources of variability and systematic error in mouse timing behavior.
    Gallistel CR; King A; McDonald R
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 14709111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acquisition of peak responding: what is learned?
    Balci F; Gallistel CR; Allen BD; Frank KM; Gibson JM; Brunner D
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 18950695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior.
    Machado A
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Apr; 104(2):241-65. PubMed ID: 9127582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time and memory: towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing.
    Staddon JE; Higa JJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):215-51. PubMed ID: 10220931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fewer peak trials per session facilitate acquisition of peak responding despite elimination of response rate differences.
    Kaiser DH
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 18793706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interval timing accuracy and scalar timing in C57BL/6 mice.
    Buhusi CV; Aziz D; Winslow D; Carter RE; Swearingen JE; Buhusi MC
    Behav Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 123(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 19824777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential reinforcement of low rates differentially decreased timing precision.
    Eckard ML; Kyonka EGE
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jun; 151():111-118. PubMed ID: 29608943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.