These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24013813)
1. Three-column classification and Schatzker classification: a three- and two-dimensional computed tomography characterisation and analysis of tibial plateau fractures. Patange Subba Rao SP; Lewis J; Haddad Z; Paringe V; Mohanty K Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Oct; 24(7):1263-70. PubMed ID: 24013813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and characterisation of tibial plateau fractures. Doornberg JN; Rademakers MV; van den Bekerom MP; Kerkhoffs GM; Ahn J; Steller EP; Kloen P Injury; 2011 Dec; 42(12):1416-25. PubMed ID: 21570072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography-based Three-Column Classification in tibial plateau fractures: introduction of its utility and assessment of its reproducibility. Zhu Y; Yang G; Luo CF; Smith WR; Hu CF; Gao H; Zhong B; Zeng BF J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Sep; 73(3):731-7. PubMed ID: 22929503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of a four-column classification for tibial plateau fractures. Martínez-Rondanelli A; Escobar-González SS; Henao-Alzate A; Martínez-Cano JP Int Orthop; 2017 Sep; 41(9):1881-1886. PubMed ID: 28685399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two column classification of tibial plateau fractures; description, clinical application and reliability. Anwar A; Zhang Y; Zhao Z; Gao Y; Sha L; Lv D; Zhang Z; Lv G; Zhang Y; Nazir MU; Qasim W; Wang Y Injury; 2019 Jun; 50(6):1247-1255. PubMed ID: 31040027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging increases the reliability of classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. Hu YL; Ye FG; Ji AY; Qiao GX; Liu HF Injury; 2009 Dec; 40(12):1282-5. PubMed ID: 19535056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver reliability of the Schatzker and Luo classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. Mellema JJ; Doornberg JN; Molenaars RJ; Ring D; Kloen P; Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):944-9. PubMed ID: 26777468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and inter-observer reliability assessment of widely used classifications and the "Ten-segment classification" of tibial plateau fractures. Yao P; Liu Y; Shan L; Zhao Y; Wang D; He Y; Wang H; Zeeshan Waheed M; Lu T; Zhou J Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():149-156. PubMed ID: 35313243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures; does computed tomography scanning improve their reliability? Brunner A; Horisberger M; Ulmar B; Hoffmann A; Babst R Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 19744652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic literature review of tibial plateau fractures: What classifications are used and how reliable and useful are they? Millar SC; Arnold JB; Thewlis D; Fraysse F; Solomon LB Injury; 2018 Mar; 49(3):473-490. PubMed ID: 29395219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The pivotal role of the coronal fracture line for a new three-dimensional CT-based fracture classification of bicondylar proximal tibial fractures. Pätzold R; Friederichs J; von Rüden C; Panzer S; Bühren V; Augat P Injury; 2017 Oct; 48(10):2214-2220. PubMed ID: 28711171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of intra and inter observer reliability of the five used classification systems of tibial plateau fractures. Koksal A; Abul K; Kargın D; Cimen O; Mert M; Keskin A Acta Orthop Belg; 2022 Dec; 88(4):805-810. PubMed ID: 36800667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tibial plateau fractures: reproducibility of three classifications (Schatzker, AO, Duparc) and a revised Duparc classification. Gicquel T; Najihi N; Vendeuvre T; Teyssedou S; Gayet LE; Huten D Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Nov; 99(7):805-16. PubMed ID: 24120208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter- and intra-observer variation of the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications of tibial plateau fractures and a proposal of a new classification system. Charalambous CP; Tryfonidis M; Alvi F; Moran M; Fang C; Samarji R; Hirst P Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 May; 89(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 17535620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Introduction of 3D-classification and its derived surgical sequence of Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures. Liu Z; Zhang Y; Wang S; Wang S; Peng A BMC Surg; 2023 Dec; 23(1):373. PubMed ID: 38071372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The classification systems for tibial plateau fractures: how reliable are they? Maripuri SN; Rao P; Manoj-Thomas A; Mohanty K Injury; 2008 Oct; 39(10):1216-21. PubMed ID: 18439607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The AO classification system for tibial plateau fractures: An independent inter and intraobserver agreement study. Besa P; Angulo M; Vial R; Vega R; Irribarra L; Lobos D; Sandoval F; Irarrázaval S Injury; 2023 Nov; 54 Suppl 6():110741. PubMed ID: 38143118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures. Dust T; Hartel MJ; Henneberg JE; Korthaus A; Ballhause TM; Keller J; Ohlmeier M; Maas KJ; Frosch KH; Krause M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2023 Feb; 49(1):189-199. PubMed ID: 35941251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. WhatsApp Messenger is useful and reproducible in the assessment of tibial plateau fractures: inter- and intra-observer agreement study. Giordano V; Koch HA; Mendes CH; Bergamin A; de Souza FS; do Amaral NP Int J Med Inform; 2015 Feb; 84(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25468642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-observer reliability assessment of the Schatzker, AO/OTA and three-column classification of tibial plateau fractures. Zhu Y; Hu CF; Yang G; Cheng D; Luo CF J Trauma Manag Outcomes; 2013 Sep; 7(1):7. PubMed ID: 24025650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]