162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24015003)
1. A clinical study of the variation in horizontal condylar guidance obtained by using three anterior points of reference and two different articulator systems.
Prajapati P; Sethuraman R; Naveen YG; Patel J
Contemp Clin Dent; 2013 Apr; 4(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 24015003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Sagittal Inclination of Occlusal Plane and Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Various Anterior Reference Points on Arcon and Nonarcon Articulators.
Palaskar JN; Joshi NP; Hindocha AD; Gunjal AP; Balsaraf KD
Contemp Clin Dent; 2022; 13(3):255-260. PubMed ID: 36213845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of a novel rotation coordinating device on registered horizontal condylar guidance of nonarcon semi-adjustable articulators.
Manshaee F; Najatidanesh F; Savabi O; Atash R
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():101. PubMed ID: 38020259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
Goyal MK; Goyal S
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study.
Tannamala PK; Pulagam M; Pottem SR; Swapna B
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 22339685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients.
Kumar CD; Selvaraj S; Mohan J; Raju R
Ann Afr Med; 2023; 22(3):316-320. PubMed ID: 37417019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of sagittal condylar guidance by protrusive interocclusal records with panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiographs in dentulous population: A clinico-radiographic study.
Galagali G; Kalekhan SM; Nidawani P; Naik J; Behera S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 27141164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Two Facebow/Semi-adjustable Articulator Systems for Orienting Maxillary Cast on Articulators: A Pilot Study.
Anusha CV; Singh AA; Sam G; Sangwan B; Shilpa M; Kamath AG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 27340168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A mathematical method for calculating the compensating anterior stop pin setting of a semiadjustable arcon articulator.
Wright WJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Mar; 61(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 2921754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinico-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans.
Prasad KD; Shah N; Hegde C
Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Oct; 3(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 23633793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
Das A; Muddugangadhar BC; Mawani DP; Mukhopadhyay A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Angles Measured Using Arcon and Non-Arcon Articulators and Panoramic Radiographs-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Aljohani AO; Sghaireen MG; Abbas M; Alzarea BK; Srivastava KC; Shrivastava D; Issrani R; Mathew M; Alsharari AHL; Alsharari MAD; Aljunaydi NA; Alanazi S; Alsharari MMS; Alam MK
Life (Basel); 2023 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 37374135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study on the influence of third point of reference on condylar guidance settings in a semi-adjustable articulator with lateral cephalographs: An in-vivo study.
Aldhuwayhi S; Mustafa MZ; Shaikh SA; Mehta S; Mathar MI; Thakare AA; Varadharaju VK; Ayub MS; Shamsudeen SM; A Khan AR
Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Oct; 24(10):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 34657010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Face-bow record without a third point of reference: theoretical considerations and an alternative technique.
Ercoli C; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Galindo D
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 10424992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Geometric analysis of occlusal plane orientation using simulated ear-rod facebow transfer.
dos Santos Júnior J; Nelson SJ; Nummikoski P
J Prosthodont; 1996 Sep; 5(3):172-81. PubMed ID: 9028221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Determined by Panoramic Radiographs to the One Determined by Conventional Methods Using Lateral Interocclusal Records in the Saudi Arabian Population.
Dewan H; Akkam TI; Chohan H; Sherwani A; Masha F; Dhae M
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2019; 9(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 32039080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinico-radiographic study to compare and co-relate sagittal condylar guidance determined by intraoral gothic arch tracing method and panoramic radiograph in completely edentulous patients.
Shetty S; Kunta M; Shenoy K
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 29430137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of condylar inclination of dentulous subjects determined by axiograph and to compare with manual programming of articulators using protrusive interocclusal record.
Prasad KD; Shetty M; Chandy BK
Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 26321837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of condylar inclination settings in two types of semiadjustable articulators.
Zabarović D; Vojvodić D; Katanec D; Jerolimov V; Carek V; Vusić J
Coll Antropol; 2009 Jun; 33(2):431-5. PubMed ID: 19662760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
