These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24015528)

  • 1. The importance of progressive senescence in the biomass dynam of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera).
    Rodriguez GE; Rassweiler A; Reed DC; Holbrook SJ
    Ecology; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1848-58. PubMed ID: 24015528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved estimates of net primary production, growth, and standing crop of Macrocystis pyrifera in Southern California.
    Rassweiler A; Reed DC; Harrer SL; Nelson JC
    Ecology; 2018 Sep; 99(9):2132. PubMed ID: 29956835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loss of foundation species: disturbance frequency outweighs severity in structuring kelp forest communities.
    Castorani MCN; Reed DC; Miller RJ
    Ecology; 2018 Nov; 99(11):2442-2454. PubMed ID: 30376154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Synchrony in dynamics of giant kelp forests is driven by both local recruitment and regional environmental controls.
    Cavanaugh KC; Kendall BE; Siegel DA; Reed DC; Alberto F; Assis J
    Ecology; 2013 Feb; 94(2):499-509. PubMed ID: 23691668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Net primary production, growth, and standing crop of Macrocystis pyrifera in Southern California.
    Rassweiler A; Arkema KK; Reed DC; Zimmerman RC; Brzezinski MA
    Ecology; 2008 Jul; 89(7):2068. PubMed ID: 18705392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Density derived estimates of standing crop and net primary production in the giant kelp
    Reed D; Rassweiler A; Arkema K
    Mar Biol; 2009; 156(10):2077-2083. PubMed ID: 24391235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wave disturbance overwhelms top-down and bottom-up control of primary production in California kelp forests.
    Reed DC; Rassweiler A; Carr MH; Cavanaugh KC; Malone DP; Siegel DA
    Ecology; 2011 Nov; 92(11):2108-16. PubMed ID: 22164835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Giant kelp,
    Miller RJ; Lafferty KD; Lamy T; Kui L; Rassweiler A; Reed DC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Mar; 285(1874):. PubMed ID: 29540514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomass rather than growth rate determines variation in net primary production by giant kelp.
    Reed DC; Rassweiler A; Arkema KK
    Ecology; 2008 Sep; 89(9):2493-505. PubMed ID: 18831171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A kelp with integrity: Macrocystis pyrifera prioritises tissue maintenance in response to nitrogen fertilisation.
    Stephens TA; Hepburn CD
    Oecologia; 2016 Sep; 182(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 27170330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Giant kelp vegetative propagation: Adventitious holdfast elements rejuvenate senescent individuals of the Macrocystis pyrifera "integrifolia" ecomorph.
    Murúa P; Müller DG; Patiño DJ; Westermeier R
    J Phycol; 2017 Feb; 53(1):230-234. PubMed ID: 27878814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wave damping by giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera.
    Elsmore K; Nickols KJ; Miller LP; Ford T; Denny MW; Gaylord B
    Ann Bot; 2024 Mar; 133(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 37463436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-term effects of hypoxia are more important than effects of ocean acidification on grazing interactions with juvenile giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera).
    Ng CA; Micheli F
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):5403. PubMed ID: 32214142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standing Crop, Turnover, and Production Dynamics of Macrocystis pyrifera and Understory Species Hedophyllum nigripes and Neoagarum fimbriatum in High Latitude Giant Kelp Forests.
    Bell LE; Kroeker KJ
    J Phycol; 2022 Dec; 58(6):773-788. PubMed ID: 36302142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Translocation of C in Macrocystis pyrifera (Giant Kelp).
    Lobban CS
    Plant Physiol; 1978 Apr; 61(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 16660341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variation in disturbance to a foundation species structures the dynamics of a benthic reef community.
    Detmer AR; Miller RJ; Reed DC; Bell TW; Stier AC; Moeller HV
    Ecology; 2021 May; 102(5):e03304. PubMed ID: 33565608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foundation species promote community stability by increasing diversity in a giant kelp forest.
    Lamy T; Koenigs C; Holbrook SJ; Miller RJ; Stier AC; Reed DC
    Ecology; 2020 May; 101(5):e02987. PubMed ID: 31960414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct and indirect effects of giant kelp determine benthic community structure and dynamics.
    Arkema KK; Reed DC; Schroeter SC
    Ecology; 2009 Nov; 90(11):3126-37. PubMed ID: 19967868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trophic versus structural effects of a marine foundation species, giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera).
    Miller RJ; Page HM; Reed DC
    Oecologia; 2015 Dec; 179(4):1199-209. PubMed ID: 26358195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nutrient availability and senescence spatially structure the dynamics of a foundation species.
    Bell TW; Siegel DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jan; 119(1):. PubMed ID: 34969854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.