These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24015773)

  • 1. The unintended target: assessing nonsmokers' reactions to gain- and loss-framed antismoking public service announcements.
    Wong NC; Harvell LA; Harrison KJ
    J Health Commun; 2013; 18(12):1402-21. PubMed ID: 24015773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of message framing and visual-fear appeals on smoker responses to antismoking ads.
    Kang J; Lin CA
    J Health Commun; 2015; 20(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 25868549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotional expressions in antismoking television advertisements: consequences of anger and sadness framing on pathways to persuasion.
    Kim SJ; Niederdeppe J
    J Health Commun; 2014; 19(6):692-709. PubMed ID: 24417482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priming effect of antismoking PSAs on smoking behaviour: a pilot study.
    Harris JL; Pierce M; Bargh JA
    Tob Control; 2014 Jul; 23(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 23322312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of message framing in anti-binge drinking PSAs: the moderating role of counterfactual thinking.
    Baek TH; Shen L; Reid LN
    J Health Commun; 2013; 18(4):442-58. PubMed ID: 23289373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Australian Smokers' and Nonsmokers' Exposure to Antismoking Warnings in Day-to-Day Life: A Pilot Study.
    Schüz N; Ferguson SG
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2015 Jul; 17(7):876-81. PubMed ID: 25481914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Friends Don't Let Friends Smoke: How Storytelling and Social Distance Influence Nonsmokers' Responses to Antismoking Messages.
    Ma Z; Nan X
    Health Commun; 2018 Jul; 33(7):887-895. PubMed ID: 28586249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of message frame in anti-smoking public service announcements on cognitive response and attitude toward smoking.
    Shen L
    Health Commun; 2010 Jan; 25(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 20390667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adolescents' perceptions of Canadian cigarette package warning labels: investigating the effects of message framing.
    Goodall C; Appiah O
    Health Commun; 2008; 23(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 18443999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of antismoking public service announcements on children's intent to smoke.
    Nixon CL; Mansfield PM; Thoms P
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2008 Dec; 22(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 19071974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of smoking norms and gain/loss antismoking messages on young Chinese adults.
    Bresnahan MJ; Zhuang J; Sun S
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2013 Sep; 15(9):1564-71. PubMed ID: 23430738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Promotion of smoking cessation with emotional and/or graphic antismoking advertising.
    Farrelly MC; Duke JC; Davis KC; Nonnemaker JM; Kamyab K; Willett JG; Juster HR
    Am J Prev Med; 2012 Nov; 43(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 23079169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditional Effects of Gain-Loss-Framed Narratives among Current Smokers at Different Stages of Change.
    Kim HK; Lee TK
    J Health Commun; 2017 Dec; 22(12):990-998. PubMed ID: 29199898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of liking for antismoking PSAs on adolescents' smoking-related behavioral intentions.
    Nan X; Zhao X
    Health Commun; 2010 Jul; 25(5):459-69. PubMed ID: 20677049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of message framing, involvement, and nicotine dependence on anti-smoking public service announcements.
    Jung WS; Villegas J
    Health Mark Q; 2011; 28(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 21815740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of message framing, intention to quit smoking, and nicotine dependence on the persuasiveness of smoking cessation messages.
    Moorman M; van den Putte B
    Addict Behav; 2008 Oct; 33(10):1267-75. PubMed ID: 18584971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulating dialogue: measuring success of the "Smoke Free Horry" campaign.
    Anderson C; Holody KJ
    Int Q Community Health Educ; 2013; 34(4):331-49. PubMed ID: 25228483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short and Sweet: The Persuasive Effects of Message Framing and Temporal Context in Antismoking Warning Labels.
    Mollen S; Engelen S; Kessels LT; van den Putte B
    J Health Commun; 2017 Jan; 22(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 27997285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of empathy- versus fear-arousing antismoking PSAs.
    Shen L
    Health Commun; 2011; 26(5):404-15. PubMed ID: 21409669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of framing and fear on ratings and impact of antimarijuana PSAs.
    Zimmerman RS; Cupp PK; Abadi M; Donohew RL; Gray C; Gordon L; Grossl AB
    Subst Use Misuse; 2014 Jun; 49(7):824-35. PubMed ID: 24502372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.