These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24016201)

  • 1. Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Yurgil KA; Golob EJ
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Dec; 50(12):1263-74. PubMed ID: 24016201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The N100 auditory cortical evoked potential indexes scanning of auditory short-term memory.
    Conley EM; Michalewski HJ; Starr A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2086-93. PubMed ID: 10616113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The modulation of auditory novelty processing by working memory load in school age children and adults: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Ruhnau P; Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 11():126. PubMed ID: 20929535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acceptance of background noise, working memory capacity, and auditory evoked potentials in subjects with normal hearing.
    Brännström KJ; Zunic E; Borovac A; Ibertsson T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):542-52. PubMed ID: 22992261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual load does not decrease the auditory steady-state response to 40-Hz amplitude-modulated tones.
    Szychowska M; Wiens S
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec; 57(12):e13689. PubMed ID: 32944959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory and Visual Oddball Stimulus Processing Deficits in Schizophrenia and the Psychosis Risk Syndrome: Forecasting Psychosis Risk With P300.
    Hamilton HK; Woods SW; Roach BJ; Llerena K; McGlashan TH; Srihari VH; Ford JM; Mathalon DH
    Schizophr Bull; 2019 Sep; 45(5):1068-1080. PubMed ID: 30753731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inattentional deafness to auditory alarms: Inter-individual differences, electrophysiological signature and single trial classification.
    Dehais F; Roy RN; Scannella S
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 360():51-59. PubMed ID: 30508609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distraction of eye-hand coordination varies with working memory capacity.
    Domkin D; Sörqvist P; Richter HO
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 23406167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?
    Horváth J
    Psychol Res; 2014; 78(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 23913121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of working memory capacity on predominance of parietal over frontal P300 amplitude.
    Guerrero L; Bouazzaoui B; Isingrini M; Angel L
    Brain Cogn; 2023 Aug; 170():106056. PubMed ID: 37339547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory working memory predicts individual differences in absolute pitch learning.
    Van Hedger SC; Heald SL; Koch R; Nusbaum HC
    Cognition; 2015 Jul; 140():95-110. PubMed ID: 25909580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual encoding differentially affects auditory event-related potentials during working memory retrieval.
    Golob EJ; Starr A
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 15032984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.
    Molloy K; Griffiths TD; Chait M; Lavie N
    J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(49):16046-54. PubMed ID: 26658858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association Between P300 Responses to Auditory Oddball Stimuli and Clinical Outcomes in the Psychosis Risk Syndrome.
    Hamilton HK; Roach BJ; Bachman PM; Belger A; Carrion RE; Duncan E; Johannesen JK; Light GA; Niznikiewicz MA; Addington J; Bearden CE; Cadenhead KS; Cornblatt BA; McGlashan TH; Perkins DO; Seidman LJ; Tsuang MT; Walker EF; Woods SW; Cannon TD; Mathalon DH
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 76(11):1187-1197. PubMed ID: 31389974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Gulbinaite R; Johnson A; de Jong R; Morey CC; van Rijn H
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():197-206. PubMed ID: 24878830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory processing under cross-modal visual load investigated with simultaneous EEG-fMRI.
    Regenbogen C; De Vos M; Debener S; Turetsky BI; Mössnang C; Finkelmeyer A; Habel U; Neuner I; Kellermann T
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52267. PubMed ID: 23251704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early auditory evoked potential is modulated by selective attention and related to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Giuliano RJ; Karns CM; Neville HJ; Hillyard SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 26(12):2682-90. PubMed ID: 25000526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatiotemporal dynamics of auditory information processing in the insular cortex: an intracranial EEG study using an oddball paradigm.
    Citherlet D; Boucher O; Tremblay J; Robert M; Gallagher A; Bouthillier A; Lepore F; Nguyen DK
    Brain Struct Funct; 2020 Jun; 225(5):1537-1559. PubMed ID: 32347366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of complexity of visual distracters on attention and information processing speed reflected in auditory p300.
    Wilson MJ; Harkrider AW; King KA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):480-8. PubMed ID: 22343547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.