These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24016838)
1. Individual differences in choice (in)flexibility but not impulsivity in the common marmoset: an automated, operant-behavior choice task. Adriani W; Romani C; Manciocco A; Vitale A; Laviola G Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():554-63. PubMed ID: 24016838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive impulsivity in animal models: role of response time and reinforcing rate in delay intolerance with two-choice operant tasks. Adriani W; Zoratto F; Romano E; Laviola G Neuropharmacology; 2010; 58(4-5):694-701. PubMed ID: 19945469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision making and risk attitude of the common marmoset in a gambling task. Tokuno H; Tanaka I Neurosci Res; 2011 Nov; 71(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 21802456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Home cage testing of delay discounting in rats. Koot S; Adriani W; Saso L; van den Bos R; Laviola G Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1169-76. PubMed ID: 19897825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Delay aversion but preference for large and rare rewards in two choice tasks: implications for the measurement of self-control parameters. Adriani W; Laviola G BMC Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 7():52. PubMed ID: 16796752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Behavioural and physiological correlates of impulsivity in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Wright HF; Mills DS; Pollux PM Physiol Behav; 2012 Feb; 105(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 21986321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanisms of impulsive choice: III. The role of reward processes. Marshall AT; Kirkpatrick K Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():134-48. PubMed ID: 26506254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impulsive choice and impulsive action predict vulnerability to distinct stages of nicotine seeking in rats. Diergaarde L; Pattij T; Poortvliet I; Hogenboom F; de Vries W; Schoffelmeer AN; De Vries TJ Biol Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 63(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 17884016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intracranial self-stimulation as a positive reinforcer to study impulsivity in a probability discounting paradigm. Rokosik SL; Napier TC J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Jun; 198(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 21536069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bilateral striatal lesions disrupt performance in an operant delayed reinforcement task in rats. Dunnett SB; Heuer A; Lelos M; Brooks SP; Rosser AE Brain Res Bull; 2012 Jun; 88(2-3):251-60. PubMed ID: 21515345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prelimbic Cortical Neurons Track Preferred Reward Value and Reflect Impulsive Choice during Delay Discounting Behavior. Sackett DA; Moschak TM; Carelli RM J Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 39(16):3108-3118. PubMed ID: 30755490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gender differences in delay-discounting under mild food restriction. Koot S; van den Bos R; Adriani W; Laviola G Behav Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 200(1):134-43. PubMed ID: 19373979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ventral medial prefrontal cortex inactivation impairs impulse control but does not affect delay-discounting in rats. Feja M; Koch M Behav Brain Res; 2014 May; 264():230-9. PubMed ID: 24556205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spontaneous alternation behavior in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Izumi A; Tsuchida J; Yamaguchi C J Comp Psychol; 2013 Feb; 127(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 22268554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Active and passive waiting in impulsive choice: Effects of fixed-interval and fixed-time delays. Smith T; Fitch A; Deavours A; Kirkpatrick K Learn Behav; 2024 Sep; 52(3):249-261. PubMed ID: 38216839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early environmental experience alters baseline and ethanol-induced cognitive impulsivity: relationship to forebrain 5-HT1A receptor binding. Hellemans KG; Nobrega JN; Olmstead MC Behav Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 159(2):207-20. PubMed ID: 15817184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual differences in gambling proneness among rats and common marmosets: an automated choice task. Zoratto F; Sinclair E; Manciocco A; Vitale A; Laviola G; Adriani W Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():927685. PubMed ID: 24971360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delay discounting for sucrose in alcohol-preferring and nonpreferring rats using a sipper tube within-sessions task. Perkel JK; Bentzley BS; Andrzejewski ME; Martinetti MP Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2015 Feb; 39(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 25684046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nucleus accumbens core lesions induce sub-optimal choice and reduce sensitivity to magnitude and delay in impulsive choice tasks. Steele CC; Peterson JR; Marshall AT; Stuebing SL; Kirkpatrick K Behav Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 339():28-38. PubMed ID: 29146281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Competitor suppresses neuronal representation of food reward in the nucleus accumbens/medial striatum of domestic chicks. Amita H; Matsushima T Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jul; 268():139-49. PubMed ID: 24726841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]