These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24018292)

  • 1. Dynamics of additional food provided predator-prey system with mutually interfering predators.
    Prasad BS; Banerjee M; Srinivasu PD
    Math Biosci; 2013 Nov; 246(1):176-90. PubMed ID: 24018292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of quantity of additional food to predators as a control in predator-prey systems with relevance to pest management and biological conservation.
    Srinivasu PD; Prasad BS
    Bull Math Biol; 2011 Oct; 73(10):2249-76. PubMed ID: 21061077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biological control through provision of additional food to predators: a theoretical study.
    Srinivasu PD; Prasad BS; Venkatesulu M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Aug; 72(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 17507068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ratio- and predator-dependent functional forms for predators optimally foraging in patches.
    Anderson JJ
    Am Nat; 2010 Feb; 175(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 20028238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A stochastic version of the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response: modelling interference for a finite number of predators.
    van der Meer J; Smallegange IM
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jan; 78(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 19120601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impacts of foraging facilitation among predators on predator-prey dynamics.
    Berec L
    Bull Math Biol; 2010 Jan; 72(1):94-121. PubMed ID: 19697089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Additional food supplements as a tool for biological conservation of predator-prey systems involving type III functional response: A qualitative and quantitative investigation.
    Srinivasu PDN; Vamsi DKK; Ananth VS
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Oct; 455():303-318. PubMed ID: 30036525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The DeAngelis-Beddington functional response and the evolution of timidity of the prey.
    Geritz SA; Gyllenberg M
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Oct; 359():37-44. PubMed ID: 24862401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biocontrol in an impulsive predator-prey model.
    Terry AJ
    Math Biosci; 2014 Oct; 256():102-15. PubMed ID: 25195089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two models of interfering predators in impulsive biological control.
    Nundloll S; Mailleret L; Grognard F
    J Biol Dyn; 2010 Jan; 4(1):102-14. PubMed ID: 22881073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A detailed study of the Beddington-DeAngelis predator-prey model.
    Haque M
    Math Biosci; 2011 Nov; 234(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21810431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of vigilance on intraguild predation.
    Kimbrell T; Holt RD; Lundberg P
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(2):218-34. PubMed ID: 17888456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Space race functional responses.
    Sjödin H; Brännström Å; Englund G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Feb; 282(1801):20142121. PubMed ID: 25589602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the impulsive controllability and bifurcation of a predator-pest model of IPM.
    Zhang H; Georgescu P; Chen L
    Biosystems; 2008 Sep; 93(3):151-71. PubMed ID: 18467020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional response and population dynamics for fighting predator, based on activity distribution.
    Garay J; Varga Z; Gámez M; Cabello T
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Mar; 368():74-82. PubMed ID: 25556688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators.
    Cosner C; DeAngelis DL; Ault JS; Olson DB
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Aug; 56(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 10438669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying predator dependence in the functional response of generalist predators.
    Novak M; Wolf C; Coblentz KE; Shepard ID
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Jun; 20(6):761-769. PubMed ID: 28480571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamical behavior of two predators competing over a single prey.
    Gakkhar S; Singh B; Naji RK
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(3):808-17. PubMed ID: 17574733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths.
    Vucic-Pestic O; Rall BC; Kalinkat G; Brose U
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 19845811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predators with multiple ontogenetic niche shifts have limited potential for population growth and top-down control of their prey.
    van Leeuwen A; Huss M; Gårdmark A; Casini M; Vitale F; Hjelm J; Persson L; de Roos AM
    Am Nat; 2013 Jul; 182(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 23778226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.