These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24018348)

  • 1. No evidence for intervention-dependent influence of methodological features on treatment effect.
    Jacobs WC; Kruyt MC; Moojen WA; Verbout AJ; Oner FC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1347-55.e3. PubMed ID: 24018348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical evaluation of which trial characteristics are associated with treatment effect estimates.
    Dechartres A; Trinquart L; Faber T; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 77():24-37. PubMed ID: 27140444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study.
    Saltaji H; Armijo-Olivo S; Cummings GG; Amin M; da Costa BR; Flores-Mir C
    J Dent Res; 2018 Jan; 97(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28813182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trial-level characteristics associate with treatment effect estimates: a systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies.
    Wang H; Song J; Lin Y; Dai W; Gao Y; Qin L; Chen Y; Tam W; Wu IX; Chung VC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):171. PubMed ID: 35705904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.
    Afshari A
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4316. PubMed ID: 21893014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Allocation concealment: a methodological review.
    Clark L; Schmidt U; Tharmanathan P; Adamson J; Hewitt C; Torgerson D
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):708-12. PubMed ID: 23648092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different methods of allocation to groups in randomized trials are associated with different levels of bias. A meta-epidemiological study.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1070-5. PubMed ID: 21474279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review.
    Krauth D; Woodruff TJ; Bero L
    Environ Health Perspect; 2013 Sep; 121(9):985-92. PubMed ID: 23771496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of allocation concealment and patient blinding in osteoarthritis trials: a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Nüesch E; Reichenbach S; Trelle S; Rutjes AW; Liewald K; Sterchi R; Altman DG; Jüni P
    Arthritis Rheum; 2009 Dec; 61(12):1633-41. PubMed ID: 19950329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
    Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
    Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical aspects of randomization and blinding in randomized clinical trials.
    Bridgman S; Engebretsen L; Dainty K; Kirkley A; Maffulli N;
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Nov; 19(9):1000-6. PubMed ID: 14608321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study.
    Dechartres A; Trinquart L; Atal I; Moher D; Dickersin K; Boutron I; Perrodeau E; Altman DG; Ravaud P
    BMJ; 2017 Jun; 357():j2490. PubMed ID: 28596181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The need for randomization in animal trials: an overview of systematic reviews.
    Hirst JA; Howick J; Aronson JK; Roberts N; Perera R; Koshiaris C; Heneghan C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98856. PubMed ID: 24906117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods.
    Devereaux PJ; Choi PT; El-Dika S; Bhandari M; Montori VM; Schünemann HJ; Garg AX; Busse JW; Heels-Ansdell D; Ghali WA; Manns BJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1232-6. PubMed ID: 15617948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Poor reporting quality of key Randomization and Allocation Concealment details is still prevalent among published RCTs in 2011: a review.
    Clark L; Schmidt U; Tharmanathan P; Adamson J; Hewitt C; Torgerson D
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 23648066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aquatic exercise training for fibromyalgia.
    Bidonde J; Busch AJ; Webber SC; Schachter CL; Danyliw A; Overend TJ; Richards RS; Rader T
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD011336. PubMed ID: 25350761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
    Schulz KF; Chalmers I; Hayes RJ; Altman DG
    JAMA; 1995 Feb; 273(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 7823387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials.
    Savović J; Jones HE; Altman DG; Harris RJ; Jüni P; Pildal J; Als-Nielsen B; Balk EM; Gluud C; Gluud LL; Ioannidis JP; Schulz KF; Beynon R; Welton NJ; Wood L; Moher D; Deeks JJ; Sterne JA
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Sep; 157(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 22945832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The quality of reporting of orthopaedic randomized trials with use of a checklist for nonpharmacological therapies.
    Chan S; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1970-8. PubMed ID: 17768194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.