These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24018348)

  • 21. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of methodological quality measures in spinal surgery research: a metaepidemiological study.
    Jacobs WC; Kruyt MC; Verbout AJ; Oner FC
    Spine J; 2012 Apr; 12(4):339-48. PubMed ID: 22381574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of methodological quality and outcome measures of acute stroke randomized controlled trials in China in recent 15 years.
    He S; Wu S; Zeng Q; Zhang S; Lin S; Zhang C; Cui X; Liu M
    J Evid Based Med; 2012 Aug; 5(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 23672224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Blinding in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical study.
    Probst P; Grummich K; Heger P; Zaschke S; Knebel P; Ulrich A; Büchler MW; Diener MK
    Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():48. PubMed ID: 27012940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.
    Strech D; Soltmann B; Weikert B; Bauer M; Pfennig A
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1214-21. PubMed ID: 21294992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother?
    Schulz KF
    Evid Based Nurs; 2001 Jan; 4(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 11707879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy.
    Linde K; Scholz M; Ramirez G; Clausius N; Melchart D; Jonas WB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Jul; 52(7):631-6. PubMed ID: 10391656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A theoretical analysis showed that blinding cannot eliminate potential for bias associated with beliefs about allocation in randomized clinical trials.
    Mathieu E; Herbert RD; McGeechan K; Herbert JJ; Barratt AL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):667-71. PubMed ID: 24767518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bias in treatment trials.
    Davies HT
    Hosp Med; 1999 Aug; 60(8):599-601. PubMed ID: 10621819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hypothesis testing in clinical trials.
    Green SB
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2000 Aug; 14(4):785-95, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 10949773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A review of methods for ensuring the comparability of comparison groups in randomized clinical trials.
    Berger VW
    Rev Recent Clin Trials; 2006 Jan; 1(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18393784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Research methods for surgeons: an overview.
    Sheps SB
    J Invest Surg; 1993; 6(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 8399003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing the methodological quality of nonrandomized intervention studies.
    Saunders LD; Soomro GM; Buckingham J; Jamtvedt G; Raina P
    West J Nurs Res; 2003 Mar; 25(2):223-37. PubMed ID: 12666645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother?
    Schulz KF
    Equine Vet J; 2005 Sep; 37(5):394-5. PubMed ID: 16163939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Understanding and evaluating clinical trials.
    Bigby M; Gadenne AS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1996 Apr; 34(4):555-90; quiz 591-3. PubMed ID: 8601646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Randomization procedures in single-case intervention research contexts: (Some of) "the rest of the story".
    Levin JR; Kratochwill TR; Ferron JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Nov; 112(3):334-348. PubMed ID: 31709560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Animal models of cardiac arrest: A systematic review of bias and reporting.
    Fabian-Jessing BK; Vallentin MF; Secher N; Hansen FB; Dezfulian C; Granfeldt A; Andersen LW
    Resuscitation; 2018 Apr; 125():16-21. PubMed ID: 29407206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials.
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Jun; 310(24):1610-2. PubMed ID: 6727931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An investigation of the adequacy of a randomization.
    Wahrendorf J; Blettner M; Edler L
    Control Clin Trials; 1985 Dec; 6(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 4075804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.