301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24018535)
1. Dose-finding design using mixed-effect proportional odds model for longitudinal graded toxicity data in phase I oncology clinical trials.
Doussau A; Thiébaut R; Paoletti X
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5430-47. PubMed ID: 24018535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose finding with longitudinal data: simpler models, richer outcomes.
Paoletti X; Doussau A; Ezzalfani M; Rizzo E; Thiébaut R
Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(22):2983-98. PubMed ID: 26109523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeated measures dose-finding design with time-trend detection in the presence of correlated toxicity data.
Yin J; Paoletti X; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):611-620. PubMed ID: 28764555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
Paoletti X; Kramar A
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
Yin J; Qin R; Ezzalfani M; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 27633877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using the continual reassessment method: lessons learned from an EORTC phase I dose finding study.
Paoletti X; Baron B; Schöffski P; Fumoleau P; Lacombe D; Marreaud S; Sylvester R
Eur J Cancer; 2006 Jul; 42(10):1362-8. PubMed ID: 16740385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose-finding designs in pediatric phase I clinical trials: comparison by simulations in a realistic timeline framework.
Doussau A; Asselain B; Le Deley MC; Geoerger B; Doz F; Vassal G; Paoletti X
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):657-65. PubMed ID: 22521954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology--a simulation study.
Gerke O; Siedentop H
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5329-44. PubMed ID: 17849502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards using a full spectrum of early clinical trial data: a retrospective analysis to compare potential longitudinal categorical models for molecular targeted therapies in oncology.
Colin P; Micallef S; Delattre M; Mancini P; Parent E
Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(22):2999-3016. PubMed ID: 26059319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose finding with continuous outcome in phase I oncology trials.
Wang Y; Ivanova A
Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 25408518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new approach to integrate toxicity grade and repeated treatment cycles in the analysis and reporting of phase I dose-finding trials.
Doussau A; Thiébaut R; Geoerger B; Schöffski P; Floquet A; Le Deley MC; Mathoulin-Pélissier S; Rizzo E; Fumoleau P; Le Tourneau C; Paoletti X
Ann Oncol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):422-8. PubMed ID: 25403589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New adaptive method for phase I trials in oncology.
Meille C; Gentet JC; Barbolosi D; André N; Doz F; Iliadis A
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Jun; 83(6):873-81. PubMed ID: 17957185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.
Abbas R; Rossoni C; Jaki T; Paoletti X; Mozgunov P
Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):522-534. PubMed ID: 32631095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying a maximum tolerated contour in two-dimensional dose finding.
Wages NA
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):242-253. PubMed ID: 26910586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phase I trial of r viscumin (INN: aviscumine) given subcutaneously in patients with advanced cancer: a study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC protocol number 13001).
Bergmann L; Aamdal S; Marreaud S; Lacombe D; Herold M; Yamaguchi T; Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K; Lentzen H; Zwierzina H;
Eur J Cancer; 2008 Aug; 44(12):1657-62. PubMed ID: 18602257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Competing designs for drug combination in phase I dose-finding clinical trials.
Riviere MK; Dubois F; Zohar S
Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24464821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose-finding design driven by efficacy in onco-hematology phase I/II trials.
Seegers V; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M
Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1574-83. PubMed ID: 21394754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.
Normolle D; Lawrence T
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Sep; 24(27):4426-33. PubMed ID: 16983110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
Du Y; Yin J; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 30403559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An adaptive model switching approach for phase I dose-finding trials.
Daimon T; Zohar S
Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 23801550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
