855 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24019019)
1. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement.
De Boo DW; Weber M; Deurloo EE; Streekstra GJ; Freling NJ; Dongelmans DA; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Clin Radiol; 2011 Sep; 66(9):826-32. PubMed ID: 21570679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laser alignment system for high-quality portable radiography.
MacMahon H; Yasillo NJ; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1992 Jan; 12(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 1734456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Bedside thoracic radiography: a comparison between 3 different types of grid].
Ciccotosto C; Storto ML; Guidotti A; Ferrante R; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 8128015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ITERATIVE SCATTER CORRECTION FOR GRID-LESS BEDSIDE CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: PERFORMANCE FOR A CHEST PHANTOM.
Mentrup D; Jockel S; Menser B; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):308-12. PubMed ID: 26487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The future of bedside chest radiography: Comparative study of mobile flat-panels and needle-image plate storage phosphor systems].
Bremicker K; Gosch D; Kahn T; Borte G
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2015 Nov; 110(8):603-8. PubMed ID: 25905891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detectability of simulated pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography.
Yano Y; Yabuuchi H; Tanaka N; Morishita J; Akasaka T; Matsuo Y; Sunami S; Kamitani T; Jinnouchi M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Sasaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2050-4. PubMed ID: 23827799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Smith A; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140613. PubMed ID: 25571914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antiscatter grids in mobile C-arm cone-beam CT: effect on image quality and dose.
Schafer S; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 22225284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
