484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24019020)
1. Clinical comparison between a currently available single-loop and an investigational dual-channel endorectal receive coil for prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study at 1.5 and 3 T.
Vos EK; Sambandamurthy S; Kamel M; McKenney R; van Uden MJ; Hoeks CM; Yakar D; Scheenen TW; Fütterer JJ
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 24019020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate imaging: evaluation of a reusable two-channel endorectal receiver coil for MR imaging at 1.5 T.
Haider MA; Krieger A; Elliott C; Da Rosa MR; Milot L
Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):556-65. PubMed ID: 24471393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and evaluation of a multichannel endorectal RF coil for prostate MRI at 7T in combination with an external surface array.
Ertürk MA; Tian J; Van de Moortele PF; Adriany G; Metzger GJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1279-87. PubMed ID: 26584144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.
Mazaheri Y; Vargas HA; Nyman G; Shukla-Dave A; Akin O; Hricak H
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e515-20. PubMed ID: 23810189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving SNR and B1 transmit field for an endorectal coil in 7 T MRI and MRS of prostate cancer.
Arteaga de Castro CS; van den Bergen B; Luijten PR; van der Heide UA; van Vulpen M; Klomp DW
Magn Reson Med; 2012 Jul; 68(1):311-8. PubMed ID: 22127763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of an endorectal coil for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate at 3.0T in comparison to 1.5T: Do we need an endorectal coil?
Hoffner MK; Huebner F; Scholtz JE; Zangos S; Schulz B; Luboldt W; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1432-8. PubMed ID: 27423684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of comfort and image quality with two endorectal coils in MRI of the prostate.
Powell DK; Kodsi KL; Levin G; Yim A; Nicholson D; Kagen AC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):419-26. PubMed ID: 23682041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of multicoil breast arrays for parallel imaging.
Marshall H; Devine PM; Shanmugaratnam N; Fobel R; Siegler P; Piron CA; Plewes DB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 31(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 20099345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute brain ischemia at 3 T: current possibilities and future perspectives comparing conventional echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging and fast spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging sequences using BLADE (PROPELLER).
Fries P; Runge VM; Kirchin MA; Stemmer A; Naul LG; Wiliams KD; Reith W; Bücker A; Schneider G
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 19363447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla.
Sosna J; Pedrosa I; Dewolf WC; Mahallati H; Lenkinski RE; Rofsky NM
Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):857-62. PubMed ID: 15354305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multitransmit external body array combined with a
Philips BWJ; van Uden MJ; Rietsch SHG; Orzada S; Scheenen TWJ
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3893-3905. PubMed ID: 31274201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging].
Beyersdorff D; Darsow U; Stephan C; Schnorr D; Loening S; Taupitz M
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 12811693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. (31) P MR spectroscopic imaging combined with (1) H MR spectroscopic imaging in the human prostate using a double tuned endorectal coil at 7T.
Luttje MP; Italiaander MG; Arteaga de Castro CS; van der Kemp WJ; Luijten PR; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA; Klomp DW
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1516-21. PubMed ID: 24357271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection--a multireader study.
Lim HK; Kim JK; Kim KA; Cho KS
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 19017927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. T1-weighted brain imaging with a 32-channel coil at 3T using TurboFLASH BLADE compared with standard cartesian k-space sampling.
Attenberger UI; Runge VM; Williams KD; Stemmer A; Michaely HJ; Schoenberg SO; Reiser MF; Wintersperger BJ
Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 19151605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation body MR imaging compared with standard MR imaging at 3.0 T: initial clinical experience.
Willinek WA; Gieseke J; Kukuk GM; Nelles M; König R; Morakkabati-Spitz N; Träber F; Thomas D; Kuhl CK; Schild HH
Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 20720078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison of image quality using endorectal and pelvic phased array coils.
Husband JE; Padhani AR; MacVicar AD; Revell P
Clin Radiol; 1998 Sep; 53(9):673-81. PubMed ID: 9766721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
