These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2401958)

  • 1. A time-domain digital simulation of hearing aid response.
    Kates JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1990; 27(3):279-94. PubMed ID: 2401958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A test suite for hearing aid evaluation.
    Kates JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1990; 27(3):255-78. PubMed ID: 2401957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic effects in in-the-ear hearing aid response: results from a computer simulation.
    Kates JM
    Ear Hear; 1988 Jun; 9(3):119-32. PubMed ID: 3410175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computer simulation of hearing aid response and the effects of ear canal size.
    Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 May; 83(5):1952-63. PubMed ID: 3403807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulating the open-loop transfer function as a means for understanding acoustic feedback in hearing aids.
    Egolf DP; Haley BT; Howell HC; Legowski S; Larson VD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):454-67. PubMed ID: 2921422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic feedback path modeling for hearing aids: Comparison of physical position based and position independent models.
    Sankowsky-Rothe T; Schepker H; Doclo S; Blau M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):85. PubMed ID: 32006989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reference ear modeling method for internally feedback controlled digital hearing aid chip.
    Kim S; Lee SJ; Cho N; Song SJ; Yoo HJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5799-802. PubMed ID: 18003331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study on the applicability of instrumental measures for black-box evaluation of static feedback control in hearing aids.
    Madhu N; Wouters J; Spriet A; Bisitz T; Hohmann V; Moonen M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):933-47. PubMed ID: 21877807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic analysis of the directional information captured by five different hearing aid styles.
    Durin V; Carlile S; Guillon P; Best V; Kalluri S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):818-28. PubMed ID: 25096115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Studies with digital hearing aids.
    Levitt H; Neuman A; Sullivan J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():57-69. PubMed ID: 2192534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new hearing aid variant. Preliminary evaluation.
    Türk R
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 3438699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech distortion measures for hearing aids.
    Williamson MJ; Cummins KL; Hecox KE
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 3430386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A technique for simulating the amplifier-to-eardrum transfer function of an in situ hearing aid.
    Egolf DP; Haley BT; Howell HC; Larson VD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3411037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Occluded-ear simulator with variable acoustic properties.
    Egolf DP; Kennedy WA; Larson VD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2813-23. PubMed ID: 1629475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Future directions in signal processing hearing aids.
    Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6 Suppl):125S-130S. PubMed ID: 1794639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing aid microphone location effects on speech discrimination in noise.
    Franks JR; Feth LL; Daniloff RG
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):241-50. PubMed ID: 7308598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of a miniature microphone in the ear canal for the verification of hearing aid performance.
    Harford ER
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(6):329-37. PubMed ID: 7439566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 1.2-V 165-μW 0.29-mm2 multibit Sigma-Delta ADC for hearing aids using nonlinear DACs and with over 91 dB dynamic-range.
    Custodio JR; Goes J; Paulino N; Oliveira JP; Bruun E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2013 Jun; 7(3):376-85. PubMed ID: 23853337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Stone MA; Alcántara JI
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Oct; 35(5):307-25. PubMed ID: 11824533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The progress of algorithms applied in digital hearing aid].
    Xiao X; Wang N; Hu G
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 21(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 15357464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.