BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

621 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24021114)

  • 1. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication.
    Muir-Cochrane E
    Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts.
    Balistreri WF
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 17643754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
    Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review: purpose, process and publication.
    Thistlethwaite J
    Clin Teach; 2012 Aug; 9(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 22783849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflict of interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
    Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(8):646-7. PubMed ID: 8452334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open access under scrutiny.
    Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Would you buy a used car from this editor?
    Nazarian LN
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1107-8. PubMed ID: 23804332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
    Morton JP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review to ensure quality in forensic mental health publication.
    Felthous AR; Wettstein RM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 25187283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behind the curtain: a look inside the publication process.
    Ludwig RL; Kellogg A
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 86(1):90-2. PubMed ID: 25224088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standard requirements for the preparation of manuscripts submitted for publication in the journal Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny.
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2004; 55(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 15332315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
    Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers.
    Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP; Minckler DS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 12834678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
    Klein JS; Harmon SP;
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A reader and author respond to "The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it".
    Jones V
    Medscape J Med; 2009; 11(1):17; author reply 17. PubMed ID: 19295938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.