These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24021251)

  • 1. Current breast imaging modalities, advances, and impact on breast care.
    Garcia EM; Storm ES; Atkinson L; Kenny E; Mitchell LS
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2013 Sep; 40(3):429-57. PubMed ID: 24021251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening.
    Mainiero MB; Lourenco A; Mahoney MC; Newell MS; Bailey L; Barke LD; D'Orsi C; Harvey JA; Hayes MK; Huynh PT; Jokich PM; Lee SJ; Lehman CD; Mankoff DA; Nepute JA; Patel SB; Reynolds HE; Sutherland ML; Haffty BG
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 23290667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening.
    Feig S
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):879-91. PubMed ID: 20868891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective study of the efficacy of breast magnetic resonance imaging and mammographic screening in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Ng AK; Garber JE; Diller LR; Birdwell RL; Feng Y; Neuberg DS; Silver B; Fisher DC; Marcus KJ; Mauch PM
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 31(18):2282-8. PubMed ID: 23610104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer: pre- and postoperative imaging for staging.
    Hansen NM; Growney A
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2007 Apr; 16(2):447-63. PubMed ID: 17560522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of focal breast lesions by means of elastography.
    Fischer T; Sack I; Thomas A
    Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):816-23. PubMed ID: 23888477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques.
    Weinstein S; Rosen M
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):1013-42. PubMed ID: 20868898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hooley RJ; Andrejeva L; Scoutt LM
    Ultrasound Q; 2011 Mar; 27(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 21343800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancer screening: clinical, radiologic, and biochemical.
    Feldman ED; Oppong BA; Willey SC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 55(3):662-70. PubMed ID: 22828098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening, imaging, and image-guided biopsy techniques for breast cancer.
    Smetherman DH
    Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Apr; 93(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 23464688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis.
    Kalles V; Zografos GC; Provatopoulou X; Koulocheri D; Gounaris A
    Breast Cancer; 2013 Apr; 20(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 23239242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast Cancer Screening.
    Euhus D; Di Carlo PA; Khouri NF
    Surg Clin North Am; 2015 Oct; 95(5):991-1011. PubMed ID: 26315519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of breast imaging to screen women at high risk for cancer.
    Sickles EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):859-78. PubMed ID: 20868890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer screening controversies: who, when, why, and how?
    Chetlen A; Mack J; Chan T
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 26093511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of the diagnostic methods on the therapeutic strategies.
    Greco M; Agresti R; Giovanazzi R
    Q J Nucl Med; 1998 Mar; 42(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 9646647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of breast imaging following mastectomy with or without reconstruction in an outpatient community center.
    Destounis S; Morgan R; Arieno A; Seifert P; Somerville P; Murphy P
    Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 18(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 21695517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.
    Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J
    Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial.
    Kuhl C; Weigel S; Schrading S; Arand B; Bieling H; König R; Tombach B; Leutner C; Rieber-Brambs A; Nordhoff D; Heindel W; Reiser M; Schild HH
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Mar; 28(9):1450-7. PubMed ID: 20177029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.