BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24021690)

  • 1. Grant applications with a result-based orientation.
    Krumholz HM
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2013 Sep; 6(5):507-8. PubMed ID: 24021690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.
    Roy HK
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):176. PubMed ID: 23060177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new paradigm for funding cardiovascular-outcome research in general practice. The Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study. ANBP2 Management Committee.
    Reid CM; Wing LM; Graham DH
    Med J Aust; 1998 Oct; 169(7):349-50. PubMed ID: 9803242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An introduction to grant writing: de-mystifying the process.
    Walsh MM; Bowen DM
    J Dent Hyg; 2012; 86(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 22309922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
    Berg JM
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Funding: the research revolution.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):975-6. PubMed ID: 18563124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grant application review: the case of transparency.
    Gurwitz D; Milanesi E; Koenig T
    PLoS Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(12):e1002010. PubMed ID: 25460001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Would You Do With a £30 Million Research Grant?
    Avkiran M; Samani NJ
    Circ Res; 2018 Nov; 123(11):1196-1198. PubMed ID: 30571472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grant applications: Undo NIH policy to ease effect of cuts.
    Benezra R
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7433):480. PubMed ID: 23344348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
    Insall R
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grantsmanship: What? Who? How?
    Sauer RM; Gabbi C
    Eur J Intern Med; 2018 Nov; 57():22-24. PubMed ID: 30396589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategic planning for research grant applications.
    Deatherage JF
    Mol Biol Cell; 2019 Nov; 30(23):2867-2869. PubMed ID: 31671038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Universities fund off-the-wall research from their own pockets.
    Braben D
    Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7726):192. PubMed ID: 30305750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why China needs an NIH.
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):679. PubMed ID: 15085093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Science funding: Duel to the death.
    Bhattacharya A
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):20-2. PubMed ID: 22859184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Japan to slash huge grant scheme.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):854-5. PubMed ID: 19829338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bill Gates funds $10 million grant to Alzheimer's Association to fuel research for Alzheimer's treatment.
    Alzheimers Dement; 2020 Feb; 16(2):384. PubMed ID: 32031316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Duplicate-grant case puts funders under pressure.
    Reich ES
    Nature; 2012 Feb; 482(7384):146. PubMed ID: 22318584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.