These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2402170)

  • 1. Severity of illness measures. Comments and caveats.
    Iezzoni LI
    Med Care; 1990 Sep; 28(9):757-61. PubMed ID: 2402170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Severity-of-illness systems. An overview for medical directors--Part one.
    Pine M; Smith DW
    Physician Exec; 1990; 16(2):10-4. PubMed ID: 10113251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes in SUPPORT.
    Oye RK; Landefeld CS; Jayes RL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1990; 43 Suppl():83S-87S. PubMed ID: 2254800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring severity of illness: a comparison of interrater reliability among severity methodologies.
    Thomas JW; Ashcraft ML
    Inquiry; 1989; 26(4):483-92. PubMed ID: 2533174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Severity of illness: red herring or horse of different color? Part 3.
    Goldschmidt PG
    Physician Exec; 1989; 15(6):5-9. PubMed ID: 10313409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of ambulatory care.
    Gonnella JS; Louis DZ
    J Ambul Care Manage; 1988 Aug; 11(3):68-83. PubMed ID: 10288686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review of the quality of care. Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments.
    Smith MA; Atherly AJ; Kane RL; Pacala JT
    JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(19):1573-8. PubMed ID: 9370502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abstraction of core measure data: creating a process for interrater reliability.
    George HA; Davis SL; Mitchell CF; Moyer NM; Toner CG
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2013; 28(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 22948009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. APACHE III study design: analytic plan for evaluation of severity and outcome in intensive care unit patients. Study design--data collection.
    Draper E; Wagner D; Russo M; Bergner M; Shortell S; Rousseau D; Gillies R; Knaus W
    Crit Care Med; 1989 Dec; 17(12 Pt 2):S186-93. PubMed ID: 2591240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Data collection strategies in SUPPORT.
    Kreling B; Robinson DK; Bergner M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1990; 43 Suppl():5S-9S. PubMed ID: 2254792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using severity data to measure quality.
    Aquilina D; McLaughlin B; Levy S
    Bus Health; 1988 Jun; 5(8):40-2. PubMed ID: 10312542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The intervention research process in occupational safety and health: an overview from the National Occupational Research Agenda Intervention Effectiveness Research team.
    Goldenhar LM; LaMontagne AD; Katz T; Heaney C; Landsbergis P
    J Occup Environ Med; 2001 Jul; 43(7):616-22. PubMed ID: 11464392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audit in intensive care. The APACHE II classification of severity of disease.
    Chisakuta AM; Alexander JP
    Ulster Med J; 1990 Oct; 59(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 2278113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a state-of-the-art approach. Evaluating hospital quality means comparing patient outcomes by various methods.
    Smith GR
    Bus Health; 1988 Sep; 5(11):20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 10288835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes management and disease staging.
    Markson LE; Nash DB; Louis DZ; Gonnella JS
    Eval Health Prof; 1991 Jun; 14(2):201-27. PubMed ID: 10111357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes management: a technology of patient experience.
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar; 320(9):600. PubMed ID: 2915677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MedisGroups data bases. The impact of data collection guidelines on predicting in-hospital mortality.
    Iezzoni LI; Hotchkin EK; Ash AS; Shwartz M; Mackiernan Y
    Med Care; 1993 Mar; 31(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 8450684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring the quality of medical care: process versus outcome.
    McAuliffe WE
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1979; 57(1):118-52. PubMed ID: 253196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevention validation and accounting platform: a framework for establishing accountability and performance measures of substance abuse prevention programs.
    Kim S; McLeod JH; Williams C; Hepler N
    J Drug Educ; 2000; 30(1):1-143. PubMed ID: 10893910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of ratings of anesthesia's contribution to adverse surgical outcomes.
    Revicki DA; Klaucke DN; Brown RE; Caplan RA
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1990 Nov; 16(11):404-8. PubMed ID: 2126083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.