These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24023272)
1. Comparing the effect of the interaction between fine and coarse scales and surround suppression on motion discrimination. Serrano-Pedraza I; Gamonoso-Cruz MJ; Sierra-Vázquez V; Derrington AM J Vis; 2013 Sep; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 24023272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal frequency modulates the strength of the inhibitory interaction between motion sensors tuned to coarse and fine scales. Luna R; Serrano-Pedraza I J Vis; 2018 Dec; 18(13):17. PubMed ID: 30593062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial non-homogeneity of the antagonistic surround in motion perception. Serrano-Pedraza I; Hogg EL; Read JC J Vis; 2011 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 21292831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaction between motion scales: When performance in motion discrimination is worse for a compound stimulus than for its integrating components. Luna R; Serrano-Pedraza I Vision Res; 2020 Feb; 167():60-69. PubMed ID: 31972446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antagonism between fine and coarse motion sensors depends on stimulus size and contrast. Serrano-Pedraza I; Derrington AM J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):18. PubMed ID: 20884593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing the link between visual suppression and intelligence. Arranz-Paraíso S; Serrano-Pedraza I PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200151. PubMed ID: 29979774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interaction of spatial and temporal factors in psychophysical estimates of surround suppression. Churan J; Richard AG; Pack CC J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):15.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence for reciprocal antagonism between motion sensors tuned to coarse and fine features. Serrano-Pedraza I; Goddard P; Derrington AM J Vis; 2007 Sep; 7(12):8.1-14. PubMed ID: 17997650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual motion discrimination experiments reveal small differences between males and females. Bachtoula O; Arranz-Paraíso S; Luna R; Serrano-Pedraza I Vision Res; 2023 Jul; 208():108222. PubMed ID: 37004491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motion thresholds can be predicted from contrast discrimination. Beard BL; Klein SA; Carney T J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1997 Sep; 14(9):2449-70. PubMed ID: 9291613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Velocity dependence of Vernier and letter acuity for band-pass filtered moving stimuli. Chung ST; Bedell HE Vision Res; 2003 Mar; 43(6):669-82. PubMed ID: 12604103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motion coherence and direction discrimination in healthy aging. Pilz KS; Miller L; Agnew HC J Vis; 2017 Jan; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 28129415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The precision of velocity discrimination across spatial frequency. Chen Y; Bedell HE; Frishman LJ Percept Psychophys; 1998 Nov; 60(8):1329-36. PubMed ID: 9865074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of center-surround interaction in motion with reaction time for direction discrimination. Hanada M Vision Res; 2012 Apr; 59():34-44. PubMed ID: 22406662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vernier in motion: what accounts for the threshold elevation? Chung ST; Levi DM; Bedell HE Vision Res; 1996 Aug; 36(16):2395-410. PubMed ID: 8917803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity to spatial and temporal modulations of first-order and second-order motion. Hutchinson CV; Ledgeway T Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(3):324-35. PubMed ID: 16360001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]