These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24023378)

  • 1. Perception of speech modulation cues by 6-month-old infants.
    Cabrera L; Bertoncini J; Lorenzi C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 56(6):1733-44. PubMed ID: 24023378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Infants Discriminate Voicing and Place of Articulation With Reduced Spectral and Temporal Modulation Cues.
    Cabrera L; Lorenzi C; Bertoncini J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 58(3):1033-42. PubMed ID: 25682333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Six-month-old infants discriminate voicing on the basis of temporal envelope cues (L).
    Bertoncini J; Nazzi T; Cabrera L; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):2761-4. PubMed ID: 21568380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infants' and Adults' Use of Temporal Cues in Consonant Discrimination.
    Cabrera L; Werner L
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 28338496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. English-learning infants' perception of word stress patterns.
    Skoruppa K; Cristià A; Peperkamp S; Seidl A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):EL50-5. PubMed ID: 21786868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modified spectral tilt affects infants' native-language discrimination of approximants and vowels.
    Beach EF; Noble W; Kitamura C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL352-8. PubMed ID: 26428839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrimination of speech sounds based upon temporal envelope versus fine structure cues in 5- to 7-year-old children.
    Bertoncini J; Serniclaes W; Lorenzi C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):682-95. PubMed ID: 18952853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech: Amplitude Modulation Versus Amplitude Plus Frequency Modulation.
    Suresh CH; Krishnan A; Luo X
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):300-311. PubMed ID: 31246660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infants use prosodically conditioned acoustic-phonetic cues to extract words from speech.
    Johnson EK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):EL144-8. PubMed ID: 18537301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infants' abilities to segment word forms from spectrally degraded speech in the first year of life.
    de la Cruz-Pavía I; Hegde M; Cabrera L; Nazzi T
    Dev Sci; 2024 Jun; ():e13533. PubMed ID: 38853379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional modulation of the phonetic significance of acoustic cues.
    Gordon PC; Eberhardt JL; Rueckl JG
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Jan; 25(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 8425384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A role for amplitude modulation phase relationships in speech rhythm perception.
    Leong V; Stone MA; Turner RE; Goswami U
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):366-81. PubMed ID: 24993221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults.
    Männel C; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1988-2006. PubMed ID: 19296725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants' and adults' segmentation of speech sequences.
    Bion RA; Benavides-Varela S; Nespor M
    Lang Speech; 2011 Mar; 54(Pt 1):123-40. PubMed ID: 21524015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The development of a phonological illusion: a cross-linguistic study with Japanese and French infants.
    Mazuka R; Cao Y; Dupoux E; Christophe A
    Dev Sci; 2011 Jul; 14(4):693-9. PubMed ID: 21676090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues.
    Llanos F; Dmitrieva O; Shultz A; Francis AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2213-24. PubMed ID: 23967951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Lin CY; Lin CD; Wang CY; Chung HK; Li X
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21047294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral integration of synchronous and asynchronous cues to consonant identification.
    Buss E; Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2278-85. PubMed ID: 15139639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tempo of spectrum change as a cue in speech-sound discrimination by infants.
    Hillenbrand J; Minifie FD; Edwards TJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Mar; 22(1):147-65. PubMed ID: 502495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.