160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24023381)
1. Gender categorization in cochlear implant users.
Massida Z; Marx M; Belin P; James C; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1389-401. PubMed ID: 24023381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Voice discrimination in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.
Massida Z; Belin P; James C; Rouger J; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O
Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):120-9. PubMed ID: 21167924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Galvin JJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 15492884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates.
Uchanski RM; Geers AE
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):90S-105S. PubMed ID: 12612484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hearing history influences voice gender perceptual performance in cochlear implant users.
Kovačić D; Balaban E
Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):806-14. PubMed ID: 20683189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Voice gender perception by cochlear implantees.
Kovacić D; Balaban E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):762-75. PubMed ID: 19640042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voice gender identification by cochlear implant users: the role of spectral and temporal resolution.
Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Nogaki G; Galvin JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1711-8. PubMed ID: 16240829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrimination of Voice Pitch and Vocal-Tract Length in Cochlear Implant Users.
Gaudrain E; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):226-237. PubMed ID: 28799983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre and Fundamental Frequency Cues to the Perception of Voice Gender and Age in Cochlear Implant Users.
Skuk VG; Kirchen L; Oberhoffner T; Guntinas-Lichius O; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 63(9):3155-3175. PubMed ID: 32881631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Seedorff M; Rigler H
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e37-51. PubMed ID: 26317298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing.
Marx M; James C; Foxton J; Capber A; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 25303861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An initial study of voice characteristics of children using two different sound coding strategies in comparison to normal hearing children.
Coelho AC; Brasolotto AG; Bevilacqua MC
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):417-23. PubMed ID: 25634776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Children's recognition of spectrally degraded cartoon voices.
van Heugten M; Volkova A; Trehub SE; Schellenberg EG
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 24213020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement in speech-reading ability by auditory training: Evidence from gender differences in normally hearing, deaf and cochlear implanted subjects.
Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):972-9. PubMed ID: 19022268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
