215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24024877)
1. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III.
McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F
Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and OPD-scan III with the subjective refraction.
Zhu R; Long KL; Wu XM; Li QD
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2016 Jul; 20(14):2988-92. PubMed ID: 27460724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and NIDEK OPD-scan aberrometers.
Kim DS; Narváez J; Krassin J; Bahjri K
J Refract Surg; 2009 May; 25(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19507795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wavefront analyzers induce instrument myopia.
Cervino A; Hosking SL; Rai GK; Naroo SA; Gilmartin B
J Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 22(8):795-803. PubMed ID: 17061717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of internal aberrometry with a new simultaneous capture aberrometer/corneal topographer.
Gifford P; Swarbrick HA
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 89(6):929-38. PubMed ID: 22543999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. OPD-Scan III: a repeatability and inter-device agreement study of a multifunctional device in emmetropia, ametropia, and keratoconus.
Asgari S; Hashemi H; Jafarzadehpur E; Mohamadi A; Rezvan F; Fotouhi A
Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 36(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 26854319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
Bennett JR; Stalboerger GM; Hodge DO; Schornack MM
J Optom; 2015; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of higher order aberrations measured by NIDEK OPD-Scan dynamic skiascopy and Zeiss WASCA Hartmann-Shack aberrometers.
Cerviño A; Hosking SL; Montés-Micó R
J Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 24(8):790-6. PubMed ID: 18856232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between wavefront-derived refraction and auto-refraction.
Yakar K; Kan E; Duran M
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Dec; 44():103712. PubMed ID: 37459941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precision of NIDEK OPD-scan measurements.
Holzer MP; Goebels S; Auffarth GU
J Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 22(9 Suppl):S1021-3. PubMed ID: 17444086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults.
Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B; Tsujimura S
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Mar; 21(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 11261343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500.
Sheppard AL; Davies LN
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 20444118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective and subjective preoperative refraction techniques for wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Perez-Straziota CE; Randleman JB; Stulting RD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):256-9. PubMed ID: 19185239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of an automated refractor using a Hartmann-Shack sensor after corneal refractive surgery and cataract surgery.
Park JH; Kim MJ; Park JH; Song IS; Kim JY; Tchah H
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1889-97. PubMed ID: 26603398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
