209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24024957)
1. Impact of maxillary advancement on speech and velopharyngeal function in patients with cleft lip and palate.
Smedberg E; Neovius E; Lohmander A
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2014 May; 51(3):334-43. PubMed ID: 24024957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft patients: Maxillary advancement and velopharyngeal function.
Harjunpää R; Alaluusua S; Leikola J; Heliövaara A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 47(12):1868-1874. PubMed ID: 31812310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Velopharyngeal Configuration Changes Following Le Fort I Osteotomy With Maxillary Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cephalometric Study.
Wu Y; Wang X; Ma L; Li Z
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):711-6. PubMed ID: 25259778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pharyngeal Flap Is Effective Treatment for Post Maxillary Advancement Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Repaired Cleft Lip and Palate.
Dentino KM; Marrinan EM; Brustowicz K; Mulliken JB; Padwa BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 74(6):1207-14. PubMed ID: 26850873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of maxillary osteotomy on speech in cleft lip and palate: perceptual outcomes of velopharyngeal function.
Pereira VJ; Sell D; Tuomainen J
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(6):640-50. PubMed ID: 24165361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Maxillary Advancement on Consonant Proficiency in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate, Lay Listeners' Opinion, and Patients' Satisfaction With Speech.
Hagberg E; Flodin S; Granqvist S; Karsten A; Neovius E; Lohmander A
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Apr; 56(4):454-461. PubMed ID: 29949386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of Le Fort I osteotomies on velopharyngeal and speech functions in cleft patients.
Janulewicz J; Costello BJ; Buckley MJ; Ford MD; Close J; Gassner R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 62(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 15015163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of orthognathic surgery on velopharyngeal function by evaluating speech and cephalometric radiographs.
Impieri D; Tønseth KA; Hide Ø; Brinck EL; Høgevold HE; Filip C
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Dec; 71(12):1786-1795. PubMed ID: 30172730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with cleft palate.
McComb RW; Marrinan EM; Nuss RC; Labrie RA; Mulliken JB; Padwa BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 69(8):2226-32. PubMed ID: 21783004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of Le Fort I osteotomy on velopharyngeal function in cleft patients.
Alaluusua S; Turunen L; Saarikko A; Geneid A; Leikola J; Heliövaara A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 47(2):239-244. PubMed ID: 30581082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Velopharyngeal function in cleft patients undergoing maxillary advancement.
Haapanen ML; Kalland M; Heliövaara A; Hukki J; Ranta R
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 9097494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of maxillary advancement on speech and velopharyngeal function of patients with cleft palate: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sales PHH; Costa FWG; Cetira Filho EL; Silva PGB; Albuquerque AFM; Leão JC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jan; 50(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 32798160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved outcomes in cleft patients with severe maxillary deficiency after Le Fort I internal distraction.
Kumar A; Gabbay JS; Nikjoo R; Heller JB; O'Hara CM; Sisodia M; Garri JI; Wilson LS; Kawamoto HK; Bradley JP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Apr; 117(5):1499-509. PubMed ID: 16641719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function.
Chua HD; Whitehill TL; Samman N; Cheung LK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 39(7):633-40. PubMed ID: 20413269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft palate orthognathic surgery.
Phillips JH; Klaiman P; Delorey R; MacDonald DB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Mar; 115(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 15731664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A pilot study of the effects of transpalatal maxillary advancement on velopharyngeal closure in cleft palate patients.
Sell D; Ma L; James D; Mars M; Sheriff M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 30(6):349-54. PubMed ID: 12425989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longitudinal data on speech outcomes in internationally adopted children compared with non-adopted children with cleft lip and palate.
Okhiria Å; Persson C; Johansson MB; Hakelius M; Nowinski D
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023; 58(5):1440-1453. PubMed ID: 36929536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation Between Speech Outcomes and the Amount of Maxillary Advancement After Orthognathic Surgery (Le Fort I Conventional Osteotomy and Distraction Osteogenesis) in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
Chung J; Lim J; Park H; Yoo A; Kim S; Koo Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 30(6):1855-1858. PubMed ID: 31107383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of orthognathic surgery on speech and breathing of subjects with cleft lip and palate: acoustic and aerodynamic assessment.
Trindade IE; Yamashita RP; Suguimoto RM; Mazzottini R; Trindade AS
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Jan; 40(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12498606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pharyngoplasty in patients with cleft lip and palate after maxillary advancement.
Maegawa J; Sells RK; David DJ
J Craniofac Surg; 1998 Jul; 9(4):330-5; discussion 336-7. PubMed ID: 9780927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
